“…For Gigerenzer [36], much of the moral behavior is based on heuristics-mental processes that disregard part of the available information and rely on satisficing, without the optimization computation. The research in the bounded rationality/awareness/ethicality area reveals specific systematic patterns, "mental shortcuts" in decision-making that affect ethical dilemmas (differences in declarative and actual behavior, the role of defaults, the role of fear and anxiety, the role of power, competition and anonymity, system 1 cognitive functioning prone to ethical fallacy, majority behavior, framing effect, blind spots, focusing failure, focusing illusion, implicit attitudes and discrimination, in-group/out-group bias, discounting the future, overclaiming credit, equality heuristic, tit for tat, default heuristic, framing of information, slippery slope, motivated blindness, indirect blindness, ethical fading, status quo bias, preference falsification, overconfidence bias, moral equilibrium scorecard, naïve idealism, availability effect, action bias, forbidden fruit, bias blind spot, representative heuristic, anchoring heuristic, moral cowardice, ethical blindness, denial, prioritization of information, motivated reasoning, [1,3,8,10,26,35,36,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]). The skewed ethical reasoning sometimes occurs when judging other people's behavior, where people tend to judge the behavior more harshly if it harms identifiable persons [49,50] or change their ethical judgment if the unethical act is carried out through third parties [51,52].…”