Why Do Multinational Corporations Locate Their Advanced R&D Centres in Beijing?

Abstract

Theories of the globalisation of innovation assume that multinational corporations (MNCs) distribute their innovation activities hierarchically, with advanced technology being confined to the advanced industrialised countries, while more routine low-end innovation is decentralised in a few developing countries. The emergence of about 40 research and development (R&D) centres in Beijing, China, many of which engage in basic and advanced applied research, challenges the above assumption. This article argues that the cheap and abundant highly skilled labour of the latecomer countries is an essential factor in attracting global R&D activities but that this factor is far from being a sufficient condition for the presence there of advanced R&D activities. Through its analysis of the historical transformation of local institutions and of their co-development with MNCs, this paper identifies four major knowledge assets that explains why Beijing could attract advanced R&D activities. First, Beijing has developed a strong entrepreneurial culture that creates highly motivated engineers who are eager to learn new knowledge from abroad. Second, the experienced Chinese returnees provide a critical bridging role between Western R&D management knowledge and local engineer culture. Third, the lack of inter-firm trust and networks makes the entrance of MNCs into a 'loose' cluster much easier. Fourth, the large and dynamic Chinese market that desires high-tech products with low prices shortens the product life cycle, forcing MNCs to upgrade their R&D facilities in China. The findings show that the co-development of local institutions with the MNC R&D centres can create locational windows of opportunity for advanced R&D activities to be carried out in unconventional sites outside the Triad countries. This article concludes with the discussion on how Dunning's Ownership, Location and Internalisation (OLI) framework and Mathew's Linkage, Leverage and Learning (LLL) framework might be useful in explaining this new phenomenon.

Desafios para Estratégia e Gestão de Centros de P&D de Multinacionais em Mercados Emergentes: Uma Abordagem pela Perspectiva de uma Matriz Alemã do Setor Químico

“…A multinacional alemã estudada vem ao longo dos últimos anos descentralizando as suas atividades globais de P&D, principalmente nos mercados emergentes, motivada pelo alto grau de crescimento desses mercados (Chen, 2008;Cefic, 2010;Unctad, 2010;The Economist, 2010 …”

“…Com relação à contribuição da subsidiária para a vantagem competitiva da corporação, Birkinshaw, Hood e capacidade tecnológica nesses mercados (Chiesa, 1996). Este processo intensificou-se nos anos de 1980, quando acentuou-se o fenômeno da globalização e da internacionalização dos negócios, com foco no avançado capital intelectual, tamanho e poder de mercado representado pelos países desenvolvidos (Chiesa, 1996;Chen, 2008 (Reger, 1999). A partir da década de 2000, pesquisas têm evidenciado um fortalecimento deste movimento, pelo aumento de confiança das EMNs em relação à capacidade de suas subsidiárias, e uma maior dependência dos mercados externos (Dunning e Narula, 2004;Fleury e Fleury, 2010).…”

“…O histórico de operações das EMNs sempre privilegiou como foco principal da sua estratégia os países desenvolvidos, motivado sobretudo pelo alto poder de consumo destes mercados (Chen, 2008;Deloitt e Touche Tohmatsu, 2006a;UNCTAD, 2010 (Bartlett e Ghoshal, 2002;Reger, 1999).…”

Designing the dragon or does the dragon design? An analysis of the impact of creative industries on urban development of Beijing

“…The proximity of the state government has some advantages for the development of creative industries due to fast decision making and implementation of plans and access to financial resources. Its status as a capital city and due to political power (Chen, 2008) it has attracted numerous (inter)national headquarters and several urban amenities, creating the right variety and a metropolitan ambiance that might attract the creative class. Moreover, the capital attracts higher income groups.…”

Does patent protection help or hinder technology transfer?

“…Therefore, the potential loss due to imperfect appropriability of knowledge in these countries is counterbalanced by the cost advantage due to low cost researchers in developing countries which explains companies' willingness to engage in FDI in developing countries with weak IPR protection. Chen (2008) suggests that the availability of a large pool of high-skilled, specialized scientists is even more important than low wages. He investigates the motives of multinational companies to establish R&D labs in Beijing.…”