Public Space Reader 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781351202558-64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose Public Space? International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such structures deteriorate the skyline and change the urban sky together and the urban land into the goods of their trade. Additionaly, such land uses try to control spaces and make them exclusive (Madanipour, 2007(Madanipour, , 2010Carmona, 2008, Knox, 2010. In fact, urban globalization affects and even scares all aspects of our life.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such structures deteriorate the skyline and change the urban sky together and the urban land into the goods of their trade. Additionaly, such land uses try to control spaces and make them exclusive (Madanipour, 2007(Madanipour, , 2010Carmona, 2008, Knox, 2010. In fact, urban globalization affects and even scares all aspects of our life.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participating in spatial management decisions creates a feedback loop-the better a space is suited to the residents' needs, the higher the degree of participation; the higher the degree of participation, the better a space suits the residents' needs [4]. In this regard, social participation in spatial management is particularly important [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying the ideological disputes, one can find a common question for social scientists: who owns public space? (Orvell & Meikle, 2009;Madanipour, 2010) Human geographers have of course looked at this issue in the past, especially in terms of a spatial struggle between two opposing views of space. In 1995, Don Mitchell looked at disputes over People's Park in Berkeley and summarized these two camps: «public space as a place of unmediated political interaction, and public space as a place of order, controlled recreation, and spectacle.» (Mitchell, 1995: 128) In this article, I will reconcile the two positions by examining them with Guy Debord's view of spectacle as a feature of capitalist society, and therefore a fixture of public space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%