Which Is a More Accurate Predictor in Colorectal Survival Analysis? Nine Data Mining Algorithms vs. the TNM Staging System

Abstract

ObjectiveOver the past decades, many studies have used data mining technology to predict the 5-year survival rate of colorectal cancer, but there have been few reports that compared multiple data mining algorithms to the TNM classification of malignant tumors (TNM) staging system using a dataset in which the training and testing data were from different sources. Here we compared nine data mining algorithms to the TNM staging system for colorectal survival analysis.MethodsTwo different datasets were used: 1) the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset; and 2) the dataset from a single Chinese institution. An optimization and prediction system based on nine data mining algorithms as well as two variable selection methods was implemented. The TNM staging system was based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system.ResultsWhen the training and testing data were from the same sources, all algorithms had slight advantages over the TNM staging system in predictive accuracy. When the data were from different sources, only four algorithms (logistic regression, general regression neural network, Bayesian networks, and Naïve Bayes) had slight advantages over the TNM staging system. Also, there was no significant differences among all the algorithms (p>0.05).ConclusionsThe TNM staging system is simple and practical at present, and data mining methods are not accurate enough to replace the TNM staging system for colorectal cancer survival prediction. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the predictive accuracy of all the algorithms when the data were from different sources. Building a larger dataset that includes more variables may be important for furthering predictive accuracy.

Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction Using Real-World Data: A Tool for Precision Medicine

“…26 Although BNs possess several advantages over regression-based methods for risk prediction, they may not always be more accurate. 27 In general, although BNs have very good risk prediction performance, their main advantages over regression-based methods are their intuitiveness and elegance, their ability to represent the JPD as a network structure, their ability to handle what-if scenarios, their efficiency in dealing with missingness, and their ability to incorporate decision and utility nodes.…”

Statistical-learning strategies generate only modestly performing predictive models for urinary symptoms following external beam radiotherapy of the prostate: A comparison of conventional and machine-learning methods

“…statistical-learning strategies failed to substantially improve prediction accuracy over simpler methods. 47,48 Logistic regression and MARS along with elastic-net provide clear and reasonably unambiguous models. They use well-established probabilistic frameworks.…”

Cancer adjuvant chemotherapy strategic classification by artificial neural network with gene expression data: An example for non-small cell lung cancer

“…The optimal ANN architecture MLP was a standard feed-forward, fully connected, backpropagation multi-layer perceptron. As show in Table 6, we also used other machine learning methods (RBF, SVM, Bayesian and K-Nearest) [24] to build prediction models, and the MLP get best result. A more detailed description of other machine learning results can be found in supplement file III.…”