2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer adjuvant chemotherapy strategic classification by artificial neural network with gene expression data: An example for non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Using gene signature profiles to predict ACT benefit in NSCLC is feasible. The key to this analysis was identifying the pertinent genes and classification. This study maybe helps reduce the ineffective medical practices to avoid the waste of medical resources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, we wondered whether expression profiling of genes previously associated with infection may help identify PJI in periprosthetic tissue, especially when synovial fluid is not available but tissues are available. For feature selection and classification of gene expression data in our study, we used a neural network approach shown to have excellent properties for the analysis of gene expression patterns ( 17 20 ). These microarray studies proved that a neural network takes into account the intrinsic characteristics of gene expression data, confirms the most informative gene subsets, and improves the classification accuracy with the best parameters based on data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we wondered whether expression profiling of genes previously associated with infection may help identify PJI in periprosthetic tissue, especially when synovial fluid is not available but tissues are available. For feature selection and classification of gene expression data in our study, we used a neural network approach shown to have excellent properties for the analysis of gene expression patterns ( 17 20 ). These microarray studies proved that a neural network takes into account the intrinsic characteristics of gene expression data, confirms the most informative gene subsets, and improves the classification accuracy with the best parameters based on data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chen et al used artificial neural networks (ANN) to model NSCLC survival. To do this, the group identified the ACT‐correlated gene signatures and performed several types of ANN algorithms to construct the optimal ANN architecture for ACT benefit classification . Then they assessed the reliability of their method by cross‐data set validation.…”
Section: Treatment Selection and Outcome Prediction For Systemic Thermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, the group identified the ACT-correlated gene signatures and performed several types of ANN algorithms to construct the optimal ANN architecture for ACT benefit classification. 41 Then they assessed the reliability of their method by cross-data set validation. The 10-fold cross validation classification offered an accuracy of 65.71%.…”
Section: Outcome Prediction For Systemic Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the development of sequencing technology, precision medicine has become a popular field in cancer research. Omics data have been widely used for cancer classification based on identified gene signatures, gene pathways, and protein-protein interaction networks, among others [3][4][5]. Such classifications can help oncologists provide more accurate treatment regimens for individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such classifications can help oncologists provide more accurate treatment regimens for individuals. Gene expression data are among the most widely analyzed types of omics data and can be used for such endeavors as biomarker identification, patient classification, and prognostic prediction [4,[6][7][8]. In addition, one published classification organized CRC into four consensus molecular subtypes using gene expression data, and this classification represents the best description of CRC heterogeneity at the gene expression level and shows the potential of merging additional scale data in the future [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%