What matters for firms? participation in Global Value Chains in Central and East European countries?

Abstract

Research background: There has been an extensive body of literature on the growing importance of global value chains (GVCs) in developed and emerging economies. This literature argues that GVCs significantly affect international trade patterns and open new possibilities for participating economies to increase both their exports’ quantity and quality, acquire advanced production technologies and improve the overall economic performance. However, the empirical evidence from the Central and East European (CEE) countries, especially at the firm level is still relatively scarce. The majority of existing empirical studies on GVCs in the CEE countries are based on sectoral input-output data.
 Purpose of the article: In this article, we study the determinants of firm participation in GVCs using firm-level BEEPS data for 29 CEE countries. We hypothesize that larger, foreign-owned, more productive and innovative firms producing a limited range of products and employing skilled workers are more likely to be involved in GVCs.
 Methods: The intensity of participation in GVCs is measured by the usage of imported inputs and the intensity of exports. The empirical study uses the BEEPS firm-level data set for the period 2011–2014 and the probit estimation method.
 Findings & Value added: The assembled empirical evidence generally supports these hypotheses. In addition, we find that firms which participate in GVCs pro-duce a smaller range of products, which means that they concentrate on their core competencies. In particular, we find that the EU membership may facilitate participation in GVCs, especially for smaller firms in the CEE countries. This article adds to the existing literature by examining the firm-level determinants of participation in GVCs using the cross-country firm-level survey conducted by the EBRD and the World Bank.

How do demographics and basic traits of an entrepreneur impact the internationalization of firms?

“…According to resource-based view, internal resources and the capabilities of the firm create and generate comparative advantages (Barney, 2001;Cieślik et al, 2019). Internal resources of a firm can be classified as human capital, physical capital and organisational capital (Barney, 1991).…”

Internationalisation motives and the multinationality-performance relationship: The case of Polish firms

“…In the context of post-transition economies and based on some earlier evidence, we argue that the internationalisation degree generally leads to better results than focusing solely on the local market. Usually, this result is explained by a set of benefits that may be derived from expanding abroad, including firms' greater flexibility, risk diversification, enhanced image, acquired knowledge and skills, ownership, and economies of scale (Wach, 2017;Szałucka, 2013;Cieślik et al, 2019, Cieślik et al, 2018Kosach, Duka, Starchenko, Myhaylovska, & Zhavoronok, 2020). In general, firms should overcome costs of international expansion that may include e.g.…”

Polish road freight transport and process of internationalisation – selected effects for quality and competitiveness

“…Internationalisation is a process defined as the employment of resources in foreign activities involving integration, knowledge (its successive development and awareness of how foreign markets operate), intangible assets and legal aspects (Hertz, 1993). It affords opportunities for companies to expand and to penetrate new, attractive markets (Cieślik et al, 2019). The internationalisation of a company's operations is often feasible only after earlier liberalisation (e.g.…”