Weak Ties in Networked Communities

Abstract

Abstract. Communities with high levels of social capital are likely to have a higher quality of life than communities with low social capital (Coleman, 1988(Coleman, , 1990Putnam, 1993Putnam, , 2000. This is due to the greater ability of such communities to organize and mobilize effectively for collective action because they have high levels of social trust, social networks, and well-established norms of mutuality (the major features of social capital). Communities with 'bridging' social capital (weak ties across groups) as well as 'bonding' social capital (strong ties within groups) are the most effective in organizing for collective action (Granovetter, 1973;Putnam, 2000). People who belong to multiple groups act as bridging ties Simmel [1908Simmel [ ] 1950 Wellman, 1988). When people with bridging ties use communication media, such as the Internet, they enhance their capability to educate community members, and organize, as needed, for collective action. This paper summarizes evidence from stratified household survey data in Blacksburg, Virginia showing that people with weak (bridging) ties across groups have higher levels of community involvement, civic interest and collective efficacy than people without bridging ties to groups. Moreover, heavy Internet users with bridging ties have higher social engagement, use the Internet for social purposes, and have been attending more local meetings and events since going online than heavy Internet users with no bridging ties. These findings may suggest that the Internet -in the hands of bridging individuals --is a tool for maintaining social relations, information exchange, and increasing face-to-face interaction, all of which help to build both bonding and bridging social capital in communities.

Properties of Teacher Networks in Twitter: Are They Related to Community-Based Peer Production?

“…These teachers also have higher degrees of centrality in indirect relations and in conversational networks, so the fact of belonging to more than one community expands the number of relations they establish, providing them with more information. These findings ratify the results of previous studies which demonstrated the prominent role of bridging people in sustaining higher rates of communication (Schlager et al, 2009) or community involvement and social engagement (Kavanaugh, Reese, Carroll, & Rosson, 2005). According to Kavanaugh et al (2005), communities that have people acting as bridges, as well as strong ties within groups, can better collaborate and their production is more effective.…”

Designing for e-science: Requirements gathering for collaboration in CiteSeer

“…Bridges are, at the most basic level, members of two or more distinct community organizations (Kavanaugh et al, 2005). In a scientific community, bridges are researchers who are part of two or more research communities (e.g., HCI and IS: Information Systems).…”

Preference effects on friendship choice: Evidence from an online field experiment

“…Second, it facilitates communication (Carley, 1991;Mayhew et al, 1995) and sharing of resources (Adler and Kwon, 2002;Kavanaugh et al, 2005;Putnam, 2001) among members of the same group. Third, it fosters individuals' group loyalty and contributes to the stability of social ties with other group members (Brewer, 1979;Van Vugt and Hart, 2004).…”