2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water security assessment of current and future scenarios through an integrated modeling framework in the Neshanic River Watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wijesekara et al [12] combined a land use cellular automata model with a hydrological model for assessing the impact of land use changes on hydrological processes in the Elbow River watershed in southern Alberta, Canada. Recently, Giri et al [13] coupled an agent-based probabilistic land use change model with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to investigate the consequences of urban growth on hydrological changes in a watershed (Raritan Basin) located in central New Jersey. Overall, these studies indicated that a rise in the urban area leads to an increase in streamflow over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wijesekara et al [12] combined a land use cellular automata model with a hydrological model for assessing the impact of land use changes on hydrological processes in the Elbow River watershed in southern Alberta, Canada. Recently, Giri et al [13] coupled an agent-based probabilistic land use change model with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to investigate the consequences of urban growth on hydrological changes in a watershed (Raritan Basin) located in central New Jersey. Overall, these studies indicated that a rise in the urban area leads to an increase in streamflow over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescriptive or optimization model results are particularly important to support water policy decisions as they can identify a strategy to be adopted to satisfy a certain objective or decision criteria, which can be hydrological (hydrologyinferred), with a function-goal where the decision on intersector allocation is derived from hydrological specifications, and an economic goal, using the economic equimarginality principle (Cai, 2008). Even when those optimization networkbased models incorporate economic criteria (Brouwer and Hofkes, 2008;Maneta et al, 2009;Salla et al, 2014;Chakroun et al, 2015;Kahil et al, 2015;Garbe and Beevers, 2017;Ghosh et al, 2017;Ahmadaali et al, 2018;Giri et al, 2018;Gunawardena et al, 2018;Maria et al, 2020) and can calculate the economic optimum (hydro-economic models) and to measure the direct economic impacts of this allocation, they are not able to obtain broader socioeconomic indicators such as: GDP, employment, government revenues, consumption, investment, exports and imports, income distribution, or comparative advantages between sectors. Models that can generate these values are known as economywide and examples of them are Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium (Bekchanov et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Integrated Economic Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing water scarcity around the world led to improve the strategies aimed to its mitigation (Wang et al 2019), though ensuring water security is still a major global challenge. Water scarcity is prevalent in many regions of the world and it is expected to increase in the upcoming years due to population growth, climate change, and land cover changes (Giri et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological and hydrological imbalances caused by land-use changes in watersheds are widely recognized in the scientific community (Giri et al 2018, Chaves et al 2019, Nikolic et al 2019, Sadeghi et al 2019. However, the influence of forest cover on streamflow at watershed scale is still controversial, as the former has been reported to affect the latter both positively and negatively, depending on the study (Hornbeck et al 1993, Andréassian 2004, Zhang et al 2017, Guzha et al 2018, Mendes et al 2018, Schenk et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%