2019
DOI: 10.14417/ap.1543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Versão portuguesa do Cyber Dating Abuse Questionaire (CDAQ) – Questionário sobre Ciberabuso no Namoro (CibAN): Adaptação e propriedades psicométricas

Abstract: Algumas manifestações de violência no namoro ocorrem através do uso das novas tecnologias, pelo que importa investigar esta tipologia de abuso apelidada internacionalmente de cyber dating abuse. O presente estudo procurou traduzir e adaptar, para a população portuguesa, o Cyber Dating Abuse Questionaire (CDAQ; Borrajo, Gámez-Guadix, Pereda, & Calvete, 2015), estudando as suas propriedades psicométricas. A versão portuguesa foi administrada a uma amostra de 272 estudantes, a grande maioria (87%) de sexo feminin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
2
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
4
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in relation to the prevalence of CDA involvement, higher rates than those of the original study (Borrajo et al, 2015a) were observed, since, in the original study, the incidence rates ranged from 10 to 82%; in this study, they ranged from 15.5% to 89.3%; in relation to victimization, while the original study indicated indexes between 14% and 75%; the present study found rates between 24.6% and 81.9%. These high prevalences corroborate the fourth hypothesis of the present research, warning that CDA is a common behavior among couples, especially in relation to Control / Monitoring (Caridade & Braga, 2019;Van Oytsel et al, 2017c;Zweig et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in relation to the prevalence of CDA involvement, higher rates than those of the original study (Borrajo et al, 2015a) were observed, since, in the original study, the incidence rates ranged from 10 to 82%; in this study, they ranged from 15.5% to 89.3%; in relation to victimization, while the original study indicated indexes between 14% and 75%; the present study found rates between 24.6% and 81.9%. These high prevalences corroborate the fourth hypothesis of the present research, warning that CDA is a common behavior among couples, especially in relation to Control / Monitoring (Caridade & Braga, 2019;Van Oytsel et al, 2017c;Zweig et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is also worth noting that there are studies with this scale in other contexts such as Belgium (Ouytsel, Ponnet, & Walrave, 2016, Ouytsel, Ponnet, Walrave, & Temple, 2016 and Mexico (García-Sánchez, Guevara-Martínez, Rojas-Solís, Peña-Cárdenas, & Cruz, 2017). More recently, there is a validation study in Portugal, which pointed to good indexes of adjustment and satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.84 and 0.91; Caridade & Braga, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the numerous Portuguese studies on ODA in the Portuguese context, e.g., [35][36][37], studies on the CDA prevalence, e.g., [15], and studies testing the association between CDA and ODA, e.g., [7], are scarce. This study aims to fill a gap in the Portuguese literature in this field, to contribute to the increasing knowledge about the relationship between CDA and ODA in a Portuguese convenience sample.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire (CDAQ) [21] was translated and validated for the Portuguese population by Caridade and Braga (CibAN-Cyber Abuse in Dating) [15] to assess CDA occurring within the scope of dating relationships, and investigating reciprocity in terms of victimization and perpetration. CibAN is a self-report measure, consisting of 40 items about various types of CDA, such as threats, identity theft, control and humiliation.…”
Section: Measures/instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation