2020
DOI: 10.1590/1413-82712020250207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire

Abstract: The present study aimed to know the validity and reliability of the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire - CDAQ in the Brazilian context. For this purpose, two empirical studies were designed. Study 1 (N = 215) tested the psychometric parameters of CDAQ, using exploratory factorial analysis. Study 2 (N = 248) sought to gather additional evidences of validity and accuracy of CDAQ using confirmatory factor analysis. The results pointed to the two-factorial structure as the most relevant, with good internal consisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Endleman (2021, p. 2), CDA is “abusive behavior committed by romantic partners or an ex‐partner using technology (e.g., social networking sites, texting, e‐mail)”; further, it “can be sexual in nature or non‐sexual” and may also “include using technology to threaten or harass a partner or using a partner's social networking page without their permission.” Doucette et al. (2021, p. 1) indicate that “electronic intrusiveness is a form of cyber dating abuse that includes monitoring a partner's location, whom a partner is talking to, and other private information via technology and social networking sites.” Both men and women can be perpetrators or victims of CDA (Cavalcanti et al., 2020; Deans & Bhogal, 2019; Guðnadóttir, 2020; Reed et al., 2017; Villora et al., 2019a, 2019b). Further, victims are commonly also perpetrators, and perpetrators may become victims (Leisring & Giumetti, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Endleman (2021, p. 2), CDA is “abusive behavior committed by romantic partners or an ex‐partner using technology (e.g., social networking sites, texting, e‐mail)”; further, it “can be sexual in nature or non‐sexual” and may also “include using technology to threaten or harass a partner or using a partner's social networking page without their permission.” Doucette et al. (2021, p. 1) indicate that “electronic intrusiveness is a form of cyber dating abuse that includes monitoring a partner's location, whom a partner is talking to, and other private information via technology and social networking sites.” Both men and women can be perpetrators or victims of CDA (Cavalcanti et al., 2020; Deans & Bhogal, 2019; Guðnadóttir, 2020; Reed et al., 2017; Villora et al., 2019a, 2019b). Further, victims are commonly also perpetrators, and perpetrators may become victims (Leisring & Giumetti, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El objetivo de esta investigación fue adaptar transculturalmente y evaluar las propiedades psicométricas del CDAQ para jóvenes mexicanos. El instrumento adaptado resultó tener índices de ajuste aceptables en el AFC, similares al estudio español (Borrajo et al, 2015) y en las adaptaciones latinoamericanas (Cavalcanti et al, 2020;Lara, 2020;Rey-Anacona et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Borrajo et al (2015) refieren que el CDAQ fue el primer cuestionario que mide el abuso digital desde una perspectiva integral, que incluye diferentes comportamientos de victimización y perpetración. Este instrumento es uno de los más utilizados para medir el abuso digital en las relaciones de pareja (Caridade & Braga, 2020;Rodríguez-deArriba et al, 2021) y ha sido adaptado en diferentes países, entre ellos Chile (Lara, 2020), Brasil (Cavalcanti et al, 2020) y Co-lombia (Rey-Anacona et al, 2021), donde ha resultado con propiedades psicométricas aceptables.…”
unclassified
“…Tais componentes apresentaram uma consistência interna satisfatória, em sua versão original, através dos índices de Alfa de Cronbach: Agressão Direta (vitimização α= 0.84; perpetração α= 0,73); e Controle/Monitoramento (vitimização α= 0.87; perpetração α= 0,81). No contexto brasileiro, tais índices foram corroborados tanto para escala de vitimização (AD α= de 0,71 a 0,78; C α= de 0,81 a 0,90) quanto para escala de perpetração (AD α= 0,67 a 0,80; C α= de 0,84 a 0,86) (Cavalcanti, Coutinho, Nascimento & Pinto, 2020). Essa medida foi respondida tomando por base uma escala de 5 pontos, que varia de 1 = '' nunca '' a 6 = '' geralmente, com escores totais que variam de 20 a 120.…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified