2019
DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-201920-1-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of higher education institution’s intellectual capital: The issue of methodology

Abstract: Оценка стоимости интеллектуального капитала вуза: методический аспект Аннотация. Статья посвящена обоснованию направлений разработки методологии стоимостной оценки вузов и их интеллектуального капитала. Оценка эффективности инвестиций в этой сфере осложняется некоммерческим характером и широким спектром разнородных видов деятельности вузов. Автор доказывает, что результаты, сформированные интеллектуальным капиталом вуза, могут быть оценены и иметь стоимостное выражение. Разработка методологии стоимостной оценк… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the assessment of the intellectual capital of universities is carried out mainly by non-financial methods [9], which are based on the determination of quantitative indicators of intellectual capital characterizing its individual elements: human, organizational and relational capital. In fact, many ratings are based on an identical approach: to form a rating, corresponding weights are assigned to various indicators to bring them to a single integral indicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the assessment of the intellectual capital of universities is carried out mainly by non-financial methods [9], which are based on the determination of quantitative indicators of intellectual capital characterizing its individual elements: human, organizational and relational capital. In fact, many ratings are based on an identical approach: to form a rating, corresponding weights are assigned to various indicators to bring them to a single integral indicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%