2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02252.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validated Composite Assessment Scales for the Global Face

Abstract: The aesthetic grading scales and global scales on estimated age and aesthetic treatment effort are reliable and valid instruments. The results suggest that a more-comprehensive evaluation of the human face and its age-related changes can help to identify important areas of facial aging and to define optimal aesthetic treatment strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The chosen population was within the framework of the Scale Summit I [23][24][25][27][28][29] and represents a spectrum that is neither too diverse nor too specific, as in a clinical study. Subjects were not to have facial hair, scarring, any previous treatment with toxins or fillers, any surgical procedures in the area of interest (treatment naïve), or HIV-related lipoatrophy.…”
Section: Subject Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The chosen population was within the framework of the Scale Summit I [23][24][25][27][28][29] and represents a spectrum that is neither too diverse nor too specific, as in a clinical study. Subjects were not to have facial hair, scarring, any previous treatment with toxins or fillers, any surgical procedures in the area of interest (treatment naïve), or HIV-related lipoatrophy.…”
Section: Subject Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of subjects for the Scale Summit II (50) was greater than for the Scale Summit I (35), [23][24][25][27][28][29] which is a common basis for such validations. The scale-creation team preselected approximately 100 photographs for validation of the upper face scales.…”
Section: Validation Of the Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Two of the three new mid face scales assess the agerelated volume changes of the cheek. They have been developed to provide an innovative means of measuring these discrete human mid face areas in an objective and reproducible way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Thus, we developed and validated a new, image-simulated grading scale that objectively assesses the aging neck, with the focus on neck volume.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%