2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
119
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, liver biopsy is a gold standard for quantification of hepatic steatosis, although transient elastography has been validated for diagnosing fatty liver [24]. Fourth, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a gold standard test for evaluating SMM; however, a multifrequency impedance body composition analyzer has good correlation with the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method and was validated [27,28]. Fifth, although waist circumference rather than BMI may affect CAP as well as SMI, we did not have data of waist circum- ference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, liver biopsy is a gold standard for quantification of hepatic steatosis, although transient elastography has been validated for diagnosing fatty liver [24]. Fourth, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a gold standard test for evaluating SMM; however, a multifrequency impedance body composition analyzer has good correlation with the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method and was validated [27,28]. Fifth, although waist circumference rather than BMI may affect CAP as well as SMI, we did not have data of waist circum- ference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multifrequency impedance body composition analyzer has good correlation with the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method and was also validated [27,28]. We obtained readings for skeletal muscle mass (SMM, kg) and visceral fat area (VFA, cm 2 ).…”
Section: Measurement Of Body Composition Determined By Bioelectric Immentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, the present study used a convenience sample of normal-weight college-age Caucasians making generalizations based on the findings applicable only to young, relatively healthy adults matching the characteristics noted in Table 1. Further investigation is warranted exploring sex-specific agreement of the seven-site US algorithm to BIA as suggested by Anderson et al [8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, these body composition analysis (BCA) techniques are cost-prohibitive, technically-cumbersome, and/or inaccessible outside of a clinical setting. Rather, common BCA techniques such as skinfolds (SKF) [7] and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) [8][9][10] were developed to provide proxy measures of these gold standard techniques. Bioelectrical impedance is a field method that measures the impedance of an electrical current as it travels through the fluid in the body.…”
Section: Brief Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmental body composition was estimated using a patented eight-point tactile electrode system. The device uses six frequencies (1, 5, 50, 250, 500, and 1,000 kHz) and produces 30 impedance values for five body segments: the right and left upper extremities, trunk, and right and left lower extremities [13]. The VFA was also evaluated using this method.…”
Section: Blood Examination and Body Composition Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%