2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using augmented reality with speech input for non-native children's language learning

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, other languages apart from English language [1] paying attention to researchers in order to evaluate the applicability of Natural Language Interaction (NLI) methods to other languages [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, other languages apart from English language [1] paying attention to researchers in order to evaluate the applicability of Natural Language Interaction (NLI) methods to other languages [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solving problems were formed through personal experience, deep exploration activities, complexity, and dynamic learning [61], [62]. The use of MAR provides a better evaluation of problem identification [63]. The process of integrating, synthesizing problems, and analyzing data could directly develop CPS abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Bacca, et al [21] stated that the most reported limitations involved maintaining superimposed information, paying excessive attention to virtual information, and considering AR as intrusive technology. In general, the most reported disadvantage concerned technical issues, specifically design flaws in the user interface [25][26][27][28] such as inconsistent responses in AR applications [25,28], unexpected programme exits, delayed responses [27,29] and inaccuracies of sensor detection [28]. As the research on AR integration in education is still developing, the resulting limitations could be overcome by fully exploring potential AR technologies with an adequate timeline for technological stability and maturity.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%