2011
DOI: 10.3329/bjmm.v5i1.15817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Staphylococcus saprophyticus and their antimicrobial sensitivity pattern in Young Adult Women

Abstract: The present study was conducted to observe the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of isolated S. saprophyticus from urine samples of patients admitted in inpatient department or visited the out patient department of Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital (SSMC& MH) Dhaka from October 2002 to September 2003. Among the isolates, Esch. coli was the most predominant (82.61%) urinary pathogens followed by S. saprophyticus (7.01%). 93.10% S. saprophyticus was isolated from females of which highest (44.82%) ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(7.9%) was found second most common bacterial isolate, which correlates with other studies too. 29,30 In contrary to our findings, some studies reported Klebsiella spp. as second common isolate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…(7.9%) was found second most common bacterial isolate, which correlates with other studies too. 29,30 In contrary to our findings, some studies reported Klebsiella spp. as second common isolate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similar study in Bangladesh was previously reported by Jhora et al, who found the predominant isolated uropathogen was Escherichia coli 82.61% and others were Staphylococcuss saprophyticus 7.01%, Klebsiella 3.86%, Pseudomonas 3.14%, Proteus 1.45%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.24%. 26 A study from Kathmandu, Nepal showed that Escherichia coli was the most prevailing organism (81.3%). 27 Another study done in India where Escherichia coli was 31.25%, Pseudomonas 15.62%, Proteus 15.62%, Klebsiella 6.25% which did not correlate with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, most of the studies done in Bangladesh, concentrate on a single disease, pathogen, or specimen. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] But, a single organism can cause different types of infection, at different sites and can cause different diseases. For example, E. coli can cause gastroenteritis, sepsis, UTI, even meningitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%