2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper incisor exposure and aging: Perceptions of aesthetics in three age groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender may be one of the factors in uencing smile aesthetics [18], but some studies [1,26] have shown that, there was no signi cant difference between male and female in evaluating the smile aesthetics, which is consistent with our study. Studies have shown that the gender of the subject could also in uence the perceived smile aesthetics [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gender may be one of the factors in uencing smile aesthetics [18], but some studies [1,26] have shown that, there was no signi cant difference between male and female in evaluating the smile aesthetics, which is consistent with our study. Studies have shown that the gender of the subject could also in uence the perceived smile aesthetics [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The rater's sex may be one of the factors in uencing perception of smile aesthetics [18], but some studies [1,26] have shown that there are no signi cant differences between male and female raters, which is consistent with our study. Studies have shown that the sex of the subject whose smile is under evaluation could also in uence the perceived smile aesthetics [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other studies showed no difference between genders. 14,29 Also, we found that the rating of gingival display and midline diastema was influenced by age of participants (P<0.05 and <0.001, respectively), which is in agreement with what the work of Pithon et al 30 showed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%