Purpose: Triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) index, as a marker of insulin resistance, have been associated with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older adults. Nevertheless, it is unclear to whether TyG index affects risk of CVD and the subtypes of CVD in general Chinese population. Methods: A total of 96541 participants who met the criteria were included from the Kailuan Study. The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglyceride [mg/dL] × fasting glucose [mg/dL]/2). The study participants were divided into 4 groups (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) by quartiles of the TyG index. Incident of CVD events (myocardial infarction and stroke) during 2006-2017 were con rmed by review of medical records.The Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the association TyG index with the risk of CVD and the subtypes of CVD by calculating the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% con dence interval (CI).Results: During a median 10.33 years of follow-up, we documented 6421 CVD events including 1493 myocardial infarction events and 5083 stroke events. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that compared with the participants in Q1 group, HR (95% CI) for CVD events were for Q2 group 1.12 (95%, 1.03-1.21), Q3 groups 1.28 (95%, 1.18-1.38), and Q4 groups 1.34 (95%, 1.23-1.45). We conducted timedependent TyG index found compared with Q1 group, HR (95% CI) for CVD events were for Q2 group 1.09(95%, 1.02-1.18), Q3 groups 1.17(95%, 1.09-1.27), and Q4 groups 1.20 (95%, 1.11-1.30). We found similar results in myocardial infarction and stroke.Conclusions: The TyG index is an independent risk factor for CVD. The TyG index may be useful identifying individuals at high risk of developing CVD at an early stage, it can contribution to prevent and control of CVD.

This study used National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys data from 1999 to 2006 to investigate the association between dietary inflammatory potential, represented by dietary inflammatory index (DII) scores, and the risk of sarcopenia in U.S. adults. A total of 25,781 participants were included in the study. The DII scores were calculated based on dietary information collected from 24-hour recalls. Men and women were classified as sarcopenic if appendicular lean mass (ALM) adjusted for BMI (ALM BMI ) was <0.789 or <0.512, respectively. The covariates included comorbidities, dietary data, demographic data, and physical examination data. In a full-adjusted model, each unit of increase in DII score was associated with a 12% increase in risk of sarcopenia. When categorizing sarcopenia into tertiles, the adjusted effect size (relative to Tertile1) was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07, 1.47) for Tertile 2 and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.31, 1.83) for Tertile 3. The trend test showed that the risk of sarcopenia increased with increasing DII tertiles, (P <0.0001). These findings demonstrate that dietary inflammatory potential correlates positively with the risk of sarcopenia and suggest that making ones diet inflammatory may reduce the incidence of sarcopenia and its associated negative health outcomes.

Bone exhibits remarkable self-repair ability without fibrous scars. It is believed that the robust regenerative capacity comes from tissue-resident stem cells, such as skeletal stem cells (SSCs). Roughly, SSC has two niches: bone marrow (BM) and periosteum. BM-SSCs have been extensively studied for years. In contrast, our knowledge about periosteal SSCs (P-SSCs) is quite limited. There is abundant clinical evidence for the presence of stem cell populations within the periosteum. Researchers have even successfully cultured “stem-like” cells from the periosteum in vitro. However, due to the lack of effective markers, it is difficult to evaluate the stemness of real P-SSCs in vivo. Recently, several research teams have developed strategies for the successful identification of P-SSCs. For the first time, we can assess the stemness of P-SSCs from visual evidence. BM-SSCs and P-SSCs not only have much in common but also share distinct properties. Here, we provide an updated review of P-SSCs and their particular responses to bone injury.

BackgroundsThe maxillary anterior teeth play a crucial role in smile aesthetics. As for maxillary lateral incisors, most studies concentrated on its size, incisor edge level, inclination, et al. However, the aesthetic effect of lateral incisor movement in spatial position has not been studied yet. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the influence of labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors on the aesthetic perception of orthodontists and laypersons and different gender groups.MethodsA photograph of a male's smile was selected. iOrtho7.0 software (Time Angel, Wuxi, China) was used to edit the three dimensional (3D) dental models. By referring to the 3D models, the photograph was digitally processed to create seven images with different labiolingual positions of the maxillary lateral incisors in 0.5 mm increments (+ indicates labial movement and -indicates lingual movement). Eighty-six orthodontists and one hundred sixty-one laypersons were asked to evaluate images using a visual analog scale. Data were analyzed by Student t-test and One-way analysis of variance with post hoc test.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the perception of males and females (P > 0.05). Orthodontists assigned lower scores to all images than laypersons. +1.5 mm was considered as the least attractive smile by orthodontists while + 1.5 mm and − 1.5 mm were regarded as the least attractive ones by laypersons. 0 mm was rated the most attractive by all judges (P < 0.05). Between the 0 mm and − 0.5 mm, laypersons observed the difference but orthodontists did not.ConclusionsThe labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors does affect the perception of smile esthetics. Although orthodontists gave lower score to each image than laypersons.

Background The maxillary anterior teeth play a crucial role in smile aesthetics. Previous studies regarding the importance of maxillary lateral incisors for smile aesthetics concentrated on their size, incisor edge level, and inclination, etc. However, the aesthetic effect of lateral incisor movement in the spatial position has not been studied yet. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the influence of the labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors on the aesthetic perception of smiles by orthodontists and laypersons, as well as analyze differences in this perception between male and female raters. Methods A three-dimensional (3D) dental model was generated from the photograph of a man’s smile using iOrtho7.0 software (Time Angel, Wuxi, China). Based on this model, seven images were generated with different labiolingual positions of the maxillary lateral incisors in 0.5 mm increments (+ indicating labial translation, and—indicating lingual translation). The images were evaluated by 86 orthodontists and 161 laypersons using a visual analog scale, with lower scores indicating less attractiveness. Data were analyzed using Student’s t test and one-way analysis of variance with post hoc test. Results There was no significant difference in smile ratings by males and females. Orthodontists assigned lower scores to all images than laypersons. The smile at + 1.5 mm was considered the least attractive by orthodontists, while smiles at + 1.5 mm and − 1.5 mm were regarded as the least attractive by laypersons. The smile at 0 mm was evaluated as the most attractive by all raters. Laypersons gave different scores to smiles at 0 or − 0.5 mm, but orthodontists did not. Conclusions The labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors does affect the perception of smile aesthetics. Orthodontists may rate smile aesthetics more critically than laypersons. Therefore, communication and discussion between orthodontists and patients is needed to achieve better therapeutic and aesthetic outcomes.