Understanding the Multidimensional Nature of Student Engagement During the First Year of Higher Education

Abstract

In the description of the complex relationship between individual students and their education context, as well as understanding of questions related to progression, retention or dropouts in higher education, student engagement is considered the primary construct. In particular, the significance of the first year of higher education in terms of engagement is decisive. We aim at developing a multidimensional conceptualization of engagement and utilized network analysis. Data were collected as part of the annual Student Barometer survey in Finland during the 2012–2013 academic year, and we gathered a nationally representative sample ( n = 2422) of first-year students in different disciplines at 13 Finnish universities. Network analysis confirmed the multidimensional process model of engagement and its six dimensions. The central dimensions of engagement are identity and sense of belonging, which develop in the interplay between individual and collective dimensions as a long-term process. Additional network analyses with covariates identified positive and negative factors that affect engagement. The study adds new perspectives to existing knowledge of engagement. It is important to understand the process-like nature of engagement and make visible factors affecting the process. Based on these findings, we provide novel practical recommendations for interventions for university students who struggle with engagement during their first year.

Finnish university students’ views of different relationships in first-year engineering mathematics courses

“…One of the main ideas was to offer students more approachable personal and targeted teaching by making the coaches' role closer to that of the students. In a study on how to retain students, Korhonen et al (2019) recommended some potential means of inhibiting alienation and dropping-out. Based on their findings, alienation and dropping-out could be inhibited by increasing students' participation and belongingness.…”

On Things that Matter in Learning Programming: Towards a Scale for New Programming Students

“…The Martela-Pessi [29] model of meaningfulness has, in our reading, not yet been examined in student context. Yet, meaning of studies has been proposed to be one of the key elements in how students become engaged in their studies [32], [33]. Peters & Pears [34], in an interesting study on meaning in CS, found that among significant aspects creating meaning for CS students were them having a sense of being a member of their study community and having been "at home" with computers & technology from an early age.…”

“…Meaning of studies is thought to be intertwined with a person's overall engagement in their studies [32], [33]. In common with both SDT and Korhonen model on student engagement [32], [33] is a social aspect, i.e.…”

Elaboração de um instrumento para avaliar motivos que podem levar à evasão na educação superior em enfermagem: um estudo metodológico.

“…A evasão do curso de graduação em enfermagem pode estar relacionada ao baixo status, pouca procura pelo curso devido à falta de autonomia profissional, desvalorização da profissão e repetência em disciplinas, horário de trabalho incompatível com a graduação, estresse devido às aulas práticas e estágios curriculares, problemas financeiros e decepção com as expectativas ofertadas pelo curso (MELLO et al, 2016). Esses são alguns fatores igualmente desencadeantes e causadores de estresse no âmbito acadêmico em enfermagem e possivelmente colabora para o processo de evasão (KORHONEN et al, 2019).…”