1998
DOI: 10.1080/87567559809596237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering the Rhetoric of the Syllabus: The Case of the MissingI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extant empirical research focuses on what students attend to in the syllabus (Becker & Calhoon, 1999;Smith & Razzouk, 1993), the purpose of syllabi (Habanek, 2005), and pronoun usage (Baecker, 1998). Research that focuses on presentational aspects of the syllabus can create a more detailed understanding of the role this document plays in the classroom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Extant empirical research focuses on what students attend to in the syllabus (Becker & Calhoon, 1999;Smith & Razzouk, 1993), the purpose of syllabi (Habanek, 2005), and pronoun usage (Baecker, 1998). Research that focuses on presentational aspects of the syllabus can create a more detailed understanding of the role this document plays in the classroom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syllabi routinely include the course assignments, due dates, and book titles (DiClementi & Handelsman, 2005;Parkes & Harris, 2002), as well as course or learning objectives (Habanek, 2005). More recently, the syllabus functions as a complex legal contract (Singham, 2005), documenting the rules and regulations for the course (Baecker, 1998). As instructors add more rules over the years, the syllabus eventuates into a document that constrains, alienates, and dehumanizes students (Singham, 2005, p. 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…researchers to identify what is being taught in the classroom and how content is organized and hopefully, delivered (Baecker 1998, Smith and Razzouk 1993, Bain et al 2002.…”
Section: Curriculum Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%