The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UHMWPE wear against roughened oxidized zirconium and CoCr femoral knee components during force-controlled simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prosthesis-wear and delamination are two major problems that limit the life of UHMWPE implants, with both phenomena being mainly the result of chemical oxidation of polymer. [1][2][3][4][5] The process of natural oxidative degradation of UHMWPE usually takes years and it is not possible to wait that long for data to be available when testing biomaterials. Hence, the oxidation of polymer is frequently conducted at highly stressing conditions, such as chemical, temperature and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosthesis-wear and delamination are two major problems that limit the life of UHMWPE implants, with both phenomena being mainly the result of chemical oxidation of polymer. [1][2][3][4][5] The process of natural oxidative degradation of UHMWPE usually takes years and it is not possible to wait that long for data to be available when testing biomaterials. Hence, the oxidation of polymer is frequently conducted at highly stressing conditions, such as chemical, temperature and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, design improvements and better quality of UHMWPE can address concerns associated with fatigue wear of the PE insert, however, there exist problems related to adhesive and abrasive wear caused by the hard counter face femoral component [39]. It has been indicated that both the polyethylene and the femoral surface are scratched and thus, roughening of the condyles occurs clinically [9]. The shapes and orientations of these scratches are the factors that increase PE wear [40,41].…”
Section: Biomaterials Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area, the number of promising biomedical materials is rapidly growing, mainly, to avoid the occurrence of implant failure and for better performance. Among the materials developed, metals and alloys such as new generation of Ti alloys, NiTi shape memory alloys, metallic glasses and porous metals [5][6][7], engineering ceramics including alumina-zirconia composites, oxidized zirconium and nonoxide ceramics [8,9], and polymeric materials such as UHMWPE-fiberreinforced high density polyethylene combined with a surface of UHMWPE, poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR-PEEK) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], are believed to be high potential materials in orthopedics. On the other hand, implant design modifications are always carried out (from simple design to complex shape similar to biological organs) to prevent any failure response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An oxidized Zr femoral component has been found to be a safe material in nickel-sensitive patients due to no traceable nickel content in this material [147]. Furthermore, it has been proven that femoral components of TKR made of this material provide less PE wear (both adhesive and abrasive phenomena) compared with Co-Cr alloy [113,[148][149][150][151][152]. However, there exist limitations including fairly modest reductions in PE wear rates and low resistance to scratching, which may be related to the lower surface hardness of oxidized zirconium compared with alumina [110].…”
Section: Oxidized Zirconiummentioning
confidence: 99%