2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tyrannies of thrift: Governmentality and older, low-income people’s energy efficiency narratives in the Illawarra, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research sheds new light on how social marketing can use serious games to assist this market segment. In doing so, this starts to address recent calls for marketing research to investigate how vulnerable or at risk consumer groups such as low‐income earners can be supported, particularly in the context of household energy‐efficient behaviors (Butler et al., ; Waitt et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This research sheds new light on how social marketing can use serious games to assist this market segment. In doing so, this starts to address recent calls for marketing research to investigate how vulnerable or at risk consumer groups such as low‐income earners can be supported, particularly in the context of household energy‐efficient behaviors (Butler et al., ; Waitt et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One area which is attracting the interest of social marketers and other disciplines who investigate low‐income earners is energy‐efficient behaviors (Butler et al., ; Waitt Roggeveen, Gordon, Butler, & Cooper, ). Low‐income consumers often face issues with managing energy costs and living (Butler et al., ).…”
Section: Context: Low‐income Household Energy Efficiency Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work of Day and Hitchings () and Waitt et al. () challenges the taken‐for‐granted stereotyped portrayal of the elderly “energy poor” as either lacking knowledge or “inefficient” in their use of scarce finances and energy. This triumvirate understanding of energy justice acknowledges social diversity, while supporting an understanding of fuel poverty as the social responsibility of the public, the government and the private sector.…”
Section: Energy Justice and Well‐beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an expansion of theoretical approaches in the field that have moved beyond the dominant individual psychology of behaviour and economic rationality perspectives (Rundle-Thiele, 2013) to embrace cultural theory Waitt, Roggeveen, Gordon, Butler, & Cooper, 2016), critical perspectives (Gordon, 2011;Hastings & Saren, 2003a) and systems-level theory ideas (Kennedy & Parsons, 2012). Recent years have witnessed the introduction of newer and more innovative research methodologies, such as ethnography , video ethnography and visual methods (Karippanon & Narayan, 2015), social media content analysis using tools such as Leximancer (Previte & Gurrieri, 2015) and cognitive neuroscience (Gordon & Ciorciari, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%