Space of energy well‐being: Social housing tenants’ everyday experiences of fuel poverty

Abstract

This paper contributes to geographical perspectives on energy justice by arguing for the concept of "spaces of energy well-being." We build on the concepts of capabilities, home, and emotional embodiment to offer an understanding of the spatiality of well-being. The paper draws on empirical material from a study conducted with social housing tenants in Port Kembla, Australia, following recent energy price increases. Interviews illustrate that social housing tenants engaged in reducing domestic energy consumption occupy a paradoxical space of well-being.We argue that energy bills are lived and felt daily through bodies as anxiety, given that participants experience social housing as a therapeutic and safe place that allows possibilities to refashion the self. We better understand the dynamics of pride and shame from limiting energy use. Our analysis suggests that essential to understanding the ways social housing tenants relate to uneven access to fuel is as an emotionally embodied home making and unmaking practice. K E Y W O R D S Australia, capabilities, emotions, energy justice, fuel poverty, sensory ethnography ---

Comfort in chaos: A sensory account of climate change denial

“…This exemplifies Shove's (2003) point that renewed attention to how and why the commercial provision of thermal comfort relates to the mobilisation and manipulation of human bodies is increasingly critical. It also reinforces Waitt and Harada's (2019) finding that energy poverty destabilises experiences of home as a place of safety and well-being, and is often experienced by community members for whom that stability is most tenuous and most critical. A tension emerges here between the lack of financial and material resources motivating participants to seek thermal refuge at the shopping centre, and the fundamentally commercial intention of the space.…”

“…In addition, pre-existing social conditions, such as financial stability, quality of resources, and social status shape the degree to which bodies are exposed to, and disrupted by, heat. For example, differences in the quality of housing and mobility options, social support and access to services, and financial and energy security lead to uneven exposure to the disruptive impacts of heat within communities (Bolitho and Miller, 2017; Waitt and Harada, 2019). As many extreme weather events do, heatwaves lay bare the inequalities already present in our societies, such that individuals and communities already relatively disadvantaged in terms of wealth, health, and privilege are likely to experience the greatest disruption, instability, and harm as a result of climate change impacts (see Bolitho and Miller, 2017; Gibson et al., 2020; Pachauri et al., 2014).…”

The Spatial Impacts of COVID-19 Restrictions on LGBTIQ Wellbeing, Visibility, and Belonging in Tasmania, Australia

“…The spaces of the wellbeing framework has been applied to a range of specific communities to understand how daily spaces enable different resources (security, capability, integration, therapy) for wellbeing. Applications include students (Beasy et al, 2020;Fleuret & Prugneau, 2015), mobile workers (Gorman-Murray & Bissell, 2018), people with physical disabilities (Lindsay, 2018), people with learning disabilities (Hall, 2010;Rotheram, McGarrol, & Watkins, 2017), people with regional disadvantage (Farmer et al, 2020;Kilpatrick, Emery, Adler, & Farmer, 2019) and public housing tenants (Waitt & Harada, 2019). The present study aims to use this framework to better understand how the spatial restrictions during COVID-19 have impacted LGBTIQ people's wellbeing in Tasmania, Australia.…”

The lived experience of COVID-19: housing and household resilience

“…Many lower-paid job sectors, such as hospitality and retail, do not have options. Households in poorquality housing are often marginal and low-waged or unwaged, and some of these experience vulnerabilities compounded by isolation and energy poverty from increased use of electricity and gas (Petrova 2018;Waitt and Harada 2019). Low-income private renters, whose ontological housing security is least protected, may also experience anxiety about possible rent arrears and the threat of eviction, despite temporary tenant-protection laws.…”