The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase flow operational maps for multi-microchannel evaporators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow maldistribution in parallel-channel two-phase heat sinks has been observed experimentally in various studies [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Maldistribution can have several causes: asymmetrical inlet header designs, differences in channel geometry or surface properties, non-uniform heating, and the non-monotonic nature of channel pressure drop as a function of flow rate.…”
Section: Flow Maldistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow maldistribution in parallel-channel two-phase heat sinks has been observed experimentally in various studies [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Maldistribution can have several causes: asymmetrical inlet header designs, differences in channel geometry or surface properties, non-uniform heating, and the non-monotonic nature of channel pressure drop as a function of flow rate.…”
Section: Flow Maldistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the heat flux that can be safely dissipated without inducing an extreme temperature rise in the heat source. Several remedies have been proposed to suppress two-phase flow maldistribution and other (parallel-channel) instabilities: inlet restrictions [3,11,16,17], reentrant cavities [18], diverging cross-sections [19], seed bubbles [20], increased system pressure [21], self-sustained high-frequency oscillations [22], and active control of pump and/or valves [23][24][25][26]. However, these measures may not effectively suppress maldistribution specifically, may be infeasible to implement in some applications, or may increase pressure drop.…”
Section: Flow Maldistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several geometric enhancements have been proposed to suppress instabilities, such as inlet restrictions [101], channel tapering [102] and the use of surface roughness [103]. Recent work at Stanford has focused on vapor/liquid phase separation, i.e., vapor extraction from a microchannel flow using permeable membrane surfaces [104] or heat pipeinspired separation using phase-separator coatings on a porous medium which keeps liquid contained within structure by surface forces, yet allows evaporation at the boundaries.…”
Section: Two-phase Liquid Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main issues revolving around flow boiling in microchannels are the instabilities, which were thoroughly covered by Kandlikar et al [6]. Several researchers implemented inlet restrictors to mitigate vapor backflows during boiling and potential nucleation cavities to lower the temperatures of the onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Another challenge in microchannel flow boiling presents the formation of solely annular flow, when the hydraulic diameter is smaller than the detaching bubble diameter [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%