“…Flow maldistribution in parallel-channel two-phase heat sinks has been observed experimentally in various studies [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Maldistribution can have several causes: asymmetrical inlet header designs, differences in channel geometry or surface properties, non-uniform heating, and the non-monotonic nature of channel pressure drop as a function of flow rate.…”
Section: Flow Maldistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the heat flux that can be safely dissipated without inducing an extreme temperature rise in the heat source. Several remedies have been proposed to suppress two-phase flow maldistribution and other (parallel-channel) instabilities: inlet restrictions [3,11,16,17], reentrant cavities [18], diverging cross-sections [19], seed bubbles [20], increased system pressure [21], self-sustained high-frequency oscillations [22], and active control of pump and/or valves [23][24][25][26]. However, these measures may not effectively suppress maldistribution specifically, may be infeasible to implement in some applications, or may increase pressure drop.…”
Two-phase heat exchangers are used in a variety of industrial processes in which the boiling fluid flows through a network of parallel channels. In some situations, the fluid may not be uniformly distributed through all the channels, causing a degradation in the thermal performance of the system. A methodology for modeling two-phase flow distributions in parallel-channel systems is developed. The methodology combines a pressure-drop model for individual parallel channels with a pump curve into a system flow network. Due to the non-monotonicity of the pressure drop as a function of flow rate for boiling channels, many steady-state solutions exist for the system flow equations. A new numerical approach is proposed to analyze the stability of these solutions, based on a generalized eigenvalue problem. The method is specifically designed for analyzing systems with hundreds of identical parallel channels.The method is first applied to analyze the flow distribution and stability behavior in two-channel and five-channel systems. The asymptotic behavior of the flow stability is then analyzed for increasing numbers of channels, and it is shown that the stability behavior of a system with a constant flow-rate pump curve simplifies to the stability behavior for a constant pressure-drop pump curve. A parametric study is conducted to assess the influence of inlet temperature, heat flux, and flow rate on the stability of the uniform flow distribution solution as well as on the severity of flow maldistribution. Below some critical inlet subcooling, uniform flow distribution is always stable and maldistribution does not occur, regardless of heat flux and flow rate. Above this critical inlet subcooling, there is a range of operating parameters for which uniform flow distribution is unstable. With increasing inlet subcooling, this range broadens and the severity of the associated maldistribution increases.
“…Flow maldistribution in parallel-channel two-phase heat sinks has been observed experimentally in various studies [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Maldistribution can have several causes: asymmetrical inlet header designs, differences in channel geometry or surface properties, non-uniform heating, and the non-monotonic nature of channel pressure drop as a function of flow rate.…”
Section: Flow Maldistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the heat flux that can be safely dissipated without inducing an extreme temperature rise in the heat source. Several remedies have been proposed to suppress two-phase flow maldistribution and other (parallel-channel) instabilities: inlet restrictions [3,11,16,17], reentrant cavities [18], diverging cross-sections [19], seed bubbles [20], increased system pressure [21], self-sustained high-frequency oscillations [22], and active control of pump and/or valves [23][24][25][26]. However, these measures may not effectively suppress maldistribution specifically, may be infeasible to implement in some applications, or may increase pressure drop.…”
Two-phase heat exchangers are used in a variety of industrial processes in which the boiling fluid flows through a network of parallel channels. In some situations, the fluid may not be uniformly distributed through all the channels, causing a degradation in the thermal performance of the system. A methodology for modeling two-phase flow distributions in parallel-channel systems is developed. The methodology combines a pressure-drop model for individual parallel channels with a pump curve into a system flow network. Due to the non-monotonicity of the pressure drop as a function of flow rate for boiling channels, many steady-state solutions exist for the system flow equations. A new numerical approach is proposed to analyze the stability of these solutions, based on a generalized eigenvalue problem. The method is specifically designed for analyzing systems with hundreds of identical parallel channels.The method is first applied to analyze the flow distribution and stability behavior in two-channel and five-channel systems. The asymptotic behavior of the flow stability is then analyzed for increasing numbers of channels, and it is shown that the stability behavior of a system with a constant flow-rate pump curve simplifies to the stability behavior for a constant pressure-drop pump curve. A parametric study is conducted to assess the influence of inlet temperature, heat flux, and flow rate on the stability of the uniform flow distribution solution as well as on the severity of flow maldistribution. Below some critical inlet subcooling, uniform flow distribution is always stable and maldistribution does not occur, regardless of heat flux and flow rate. Above this critical inlet subcooling, there is a range of operating parameters for which uniform flow distribution is unstable. With increasing inlet subcooling, this range broadens and the severity of the associated maldistribution increases.
“…Several geometric enhancements have been proposed to suppress instabilities, such as inlet restrictions [101], channel tapering [102] and the use of surface roughness [103]. Recent work at Stanford has focused on vapor/liquid phase separation, i.e., vapor extraction from a microchannel flow using permeable membrane surfaces [104] or heat pipeinspired separation using phase-separator coatings on a porous medium which keeps liquid contained within structure by surface forces, yet allows evaporation at the boundaries.…”
“…The main issues revolving around flow boiling in microchannels are the instabilities, which were thoroughly covered by Kandlikar et al [6]. Several researchers implemented inlet restrictors to mitigate vapor backflows during boiling and potential nucleation cavities to lower the temperatures of the onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Another challenge in microchannel flow boiling presents the formation of solely annular flow, when the hydraulic diameter is smaller than the detaching bubble diameter [14].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.