1993
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2922:tioias>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical Intraseasonal Oscillations in a Simple Nonlinear Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
175
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
175
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This regulatory cycle is likely at work on intraseasonal time scales, but is perhaps much less efficient for a period typical of the Kelvin wave. The development of Kelvin wave convection therefore proceeds without the help of an external thermodynamic driver similar to the discharge-recharge mechanism proposed to explain the MJO periodicity (Bladé and Hartmann 1993).…”
Section: Kelvin Wavesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This regulatory cycle is likely at work on intraseasonal time scales, but is perhaps much less efficient for a period typical of the Kelvin wave. The development of Kelvin wave convection therefore proceeds without the help of an external thermodynamic driver similar to the discharge-recharge mechanism proposed to explain the MJO periodicity (Bladé and Hartmann 1993).…”
Section: Kelvin Wavesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Radiative effects of high clouds may enhance the upper-tropospheric cooling (Hu and Randall 1994), promote the greenhouse effect (Stephens et al 2004), or simply induce an energy transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere (Sobel and Gildor 2003). A locally regulated thermodynamic cycle would be a key that controls the MJO period (Bladé and Hartmann 1993), since the interaction between the Kelvin and ER waves discussed above could explain the propagation of the MJO, but not its periodicity. …”
Section: Madden-julian Oscillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…convergence, the boundary layer moisture convergence, the surface heat flux anomaly (latent plus sensible) due to wind variation, the local moisture tendency, the radiative heating, and the surface heat flux anomaly due to SST variation. These six components have been emphasized by wave-CISK (e.g., Lau and Peng 1987;Chang and Lim 1988;Hendon 1988;Dunkerton and Crum 1991), frictional wave-CISK (e.g., Wang and Rui 1990;Salby et al 1994), windinduced surface heat exchange (WISHE; e.g., Emanuel 1987;Neelin et al 1987), charge-discharge (e.g., Bladé and Hartmann 1993;Hayashi and Golder 1997;Majda 2006, 2007), cloud-radiation interaction (e.g., Raymond 2001;Lee et al 2001;Bony and Emanuel 2005;Zurovac-Jevtić et al 2006;Lin et al 2007), and air-sea coupling (e.g., Flatau et al 1997;Wang and Xie 1998;Waliser et al 1999) theories, respectively. These mechanisms also interact with one another, with the vertical heating structure (e.g., Mapes 2000; Majda and Shefter 2001;Haertel and Kiladis 2004;Khouider and Majda 2006), and with nonlinear effects of subscale perturbations (e.g., Majda and Klein 2003;Moncrieff 2004;Biello andMajda 2005, 2006;Majda 2007).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convective build-up is connected with the moistening process in the lower troposphere. Several theories have been proposed for the MJO moistening process, including frictional moisture convergence in the boundary layer (Wang 1988;Hendon and Salby 1994), and recharge process on the time-scale of the radiative-convective feedback (Bladé and Hartmann 1993;Hu and Randall 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%