1992
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(92)95837-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient charge collection from ion tracks in semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soft error issue was unresolved and required additional investigation [69]. SRAM soft error tests [70], [71] and charge collection experiments [72], [73], with the help of device simulation tools [74], determined that the SEE sensitivity was related to several items: 1) the uninsulated GaAs FET gate; 2) hole collection in the semi-insulating substrate that provided a mechanism to induce a bipolar transistor effect [73] or back-gate [74]; and 3) the low-doped substrate that provided long diffusion lengths, which increased collection volumes. Also, as noted in Table I, the ionization in GaAs per unit length is higher than that of silicon.…”
Section: Radiation Effects In the 1990smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft error issue was unresolved and required additional investigation [69]. SRAM soft error tests [70], [71] and charge collection experiments [72], [73], with the help of device simulation tools [74], determined that the SEE sensitivity was related to several items: 1) the uninsulated GaAs FET gate; 2) hole collection in the semi-insulating substrate that provided a mechanism to induce a bipolar transistor effect [73] or back-gate [74]; and 3) the low-doped substrate that provided long diffusion lengths, which increased collection volumes. Also, as noted in Table I, the ionization in GaAs per unit length is higher than that of silicon.…”
Section: Radiation Effects In the 1990smentioning
confidence: 99%