2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.027961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent laser linewidth: beat-note digital acquisition and numerical analysis

Abstract: We revisit and improve the optical heterodyne technique for the measurement of the laser coherence, by digital acquisition of the beat-note and numerical analysis of the resulting signal. Our main result is that with the same experimental setup we reach the very "short-time linewidth" with the highest accuracy as well as the frequency noise spectrum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each spectrum in this set was analyzed using a Voigt fit to extract the Lorentzian width. Each spectrum showed a slightly different center position and spectral shape, due to drift of the hybrid laser and reference laser [45]. Two representative examples are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Spectral Linewidth Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each spectrum in this set was analyzed using a Voigt fit to extract the Lorentzian width. Each spectrum showed a slightly different center position and spectral shape, due to drift of the hybrid laser and reference laser [45]. Two representative examples are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Spectral Linewidth Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we demonstrate both numerically and experimentally that optical phase and frequency noise measurement methods which solve the MMSE problem significantly outperform -in the achievable measurement range and accuracy -conventional techniques relying on delayinterferometer and direct demodulation, respectively [3], [4]. The reason for this is that the methods reported in [3], [4], are not a solution to the MMSE problem and thereby do not employ any filtering of the measurement noise. Another widely used approach, not compared to in this paper, is based on cross-correlation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that the phase and frequency noise measurement techniques reported in [3], [4], [5] do provide accurate phase and frequency noise measurements if the optical power is sufficiently high and the frequency range of interest is not too large (up to ∼10 MHz). However, the conventional methods do not scale well for low optical signal powers and when measuring frequencies exceeding ∼10 MHz (SNR decreases for increasing measurement bandwidth).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing work will extend these experiments to study the time-dependence of the linewidth [1], and apply these techniques to lasers at various wavelengths of interest for quantum technologies (including 698, 780 and 813 nm).…”
Section: In Partnership Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterodyne measurement -beat note between ring laser and commercial NPRO (Coherent Inc, Mephisto, specified linewidth of 1 kHz over 100 ms), recorded in frequency domain (RF spectrum analyser) and in time domain (high-speed digitiser). Time-domain data used to calculate frequency noise PSD [1] (independent measurement from frequency discriminator approach).…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%