2014
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-year visual outcome of photodynamic therapy plus intravitreal bevacizumab with or without subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injections for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Abstract: Initial therapy consisting of a single session of PDT combined with IVB and STTA improves vision in treatment-naive subfoveal PCV. Compared with double therapy, this triple therapy may be more effective for PCV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection for the treatment of eyes with PCV [812]; in particular, combination therapy can exert synergistic effects on regressing polyps and better maintain visual acuity and retinal morphology when compared with PDT or anti-VEGF monotherapy. In addition, the great advantage of triple combination therapy composed of anti-VEGF injection, PDT, and subtenon steroid injection had been reported [13, 14]. Therefore, combination therapy should be considered as the first-line treatment for eyes with PCV [15, 16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection for the treatment of eyes with PCV [812]; in particular, combination therapy can exert synergistic effects on regressing polyps and better maintain visual acuity and retinal morphology when compared with PDT or anti-VEGF monotherapy. In addition, the great advantage of triple combination therapy composed of anti-VEGF injection, PDT, and subtenon steroid injection had been reported [13, 14]. Therefore, combination therapy should be considered as the first-line treatment for eyes with PCV [15, 16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We elected to use combination treatment with bevacizumab and PDT to target the type 2 component with anti-VEGF, and PDT to decrease the size and flow and prevent maturation of the extrafoveal, type 1 lesion. Successful combined treatment has been similarly observed in myopic classic CNV [11] and in PCV [3] . Type 1 NV has been shown to be quite extensive on OCTA and may represent a more chronic, mature neovascular complex resistant to repetitive anti-VEGF therapy [9] , [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The discovery of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has revolutionized the management of nAMD and provided unprecedented gains in visual acuity since their development. Prior to anti-VEGF, photodynamic therapy with Verteporfin (PDT) was used to treat classic CNV (Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) investigations) [2] , and more recently, PDT combined with anti-VEGF treatments including bevacizumab or ranibizumab have been utilized to successfully treat polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) [3] and retinal angiomatous proliferation [4] . Although combination treatment remains effective, the immediate and long-term effects of PDT including the extent of choroidal vascular thrombosis and possible collateral choroidal damage has not been clearly imaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triple therapy by using PDT, anti-VEGF agents and subtenon steroid therapy has been reported previously. Sakai et al showed that using subtenon steroid injection in addition to combined PDT and anti-VEGF reduced the total number of anti-VEGF injections from a mean of 5.26 to 3.95 in the first year of treatment43. Beneficial results by triple therapy when compared to PDT alone were also shown by Nakata et al in a study of 40 retrospective cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%