PurposeTo report the swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) findings after bevacizumab anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and full-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) for choroidal neovascularization.DesignCase report.MethodsAn 87-year-old, Chinese male presented with a shadow and decreased vision to 20/160 in his left eye (OS). Clinical examination, color photographs, swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), widefield dye-fluorescein angiography (FA) and SS-OCTA revealed an extrafoveal, subretinal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the superior macula. Bevacizumab anti-VEGF and full-fluence PDT was initiated.ResultsInitial imaging with conventional color photography and FA demonstrated a classic CNV with significant early hyperfluorescence and late leakage. SS-OCT demonstrated subretinal hyperreflective material, fluid and hemorrhage emanating from a subretinal, type 2 neovascularization (NV). SS-OCTA showed a mixed lesion with a type 2, subretinal component with segmentation above the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and a type 1, sub-RPE component below. Treatment with anti-VEGF and PDT led to immediate regression of the CNV. One month after treatment, SS-OCTA demonstrated significant resolution of the type, 2 subretinal component and decreased flow and size of the type 1 sub-RPE lesion.ConclusionWe report the first SS-OCTA images of successfully treated extrafoveal NV after combination PDT and ant-VEGF therapy. Early treatment of extrafoveal NV may improve our ability to treat mixed type 1 and 2 NV before these neovascular complexes mature from repetitive anti-VEGF treatment.
ImportanceRetinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disease. Bevacizumab was demonstrated in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) to be noninferior to aflibercept with respect to visual acuity in study participants with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) following 6 months of therapy. In this study, the cost-utility of bevacizumab vs aflibercept for treatment of CRVO is evaluated.ObjectiveTo investigate the relative cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab vs aflibercept for treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis economic evaluation study used a microsimulation cohort of patients with clinical and demographic characteristics similar to those of SCORE2 participants and a Markov process. Parameters were estimated and validated using a split-sample approach of the SCORE2 population. The simulated cohort included 5000 patients who were evaluated 100 times, each with a different set of characteristics randomly selected based on the SCORE2 trial. SCORE2 data were collected from September 2014 October 2019, and data were analyzed from October 2019 to July 2021.InterventionsBevacizumab (followed by aflibercept among patients with a protocol-defined poor or marginal response to bevacizumab at month 6) vs aflibercept (followed by a dexamethasone implant among patients with a protocol-defined poor or marginal response to aflibercept at month 6).Main Outcomes and MeasuresIncremental cost-utility ratio.ResultsThe simulation demonstrated that patients treated with aflibercept will have an expected cost $18 127 greater than those treated with bevacizumab in the year following initiation. When coupled with the lack of clinical superiority over bevacizumab (ie, patients treated with bevacizumab had a gain over aflibercept in visual acuity letter score of 4 in the treated eye and 2 in the fellow eye), these results demonstrate that first-line treatment with bevacizumab dominated aflibercept in the simulated cohort of SCORE2 participants. At current price levels, aflibercept would be considered the preferred cost-effective option only if treatment restored the patient to nearly perfect health.Conclusions and RelevanceWhile there will be some patients with CRVO-associated or HRVO-associated macular edema who will benefit from first-line treatment with aflibercept rather than bevacizumab, given the minimal differences in visual acuity outcomes and large cost differences for bevacizumab vs aflibercept, first-line treatment with bevacizumab is cost-effective for this condition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.