2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value orientation approach to understanding culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hofstede's (1980) four value dimensions remain widely applied as a tool to evaluate cultural values. Yet, Hofstede's conceptualisation of personal values is criticised for its etic perspective and, for instance, the use of Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's (1961) value orientation framework has instead been suggested for its more emic approach (see Watkins & Gnoth, 2011a). Also, applications of 'non-Western' scales such as the Chinese Value Survey (Wong & Lau, 2001) remain exceptions in understanding the values of tourists from emerging markets.…”
Section: Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Hofstede's (1980) four value dimensions remain widely applied as a tool to evaluate cultural values. Yet, Hofstede's conceptualisation of personal values is criticised for its etic perspective and, for instance, the use of Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's (1961) value orientation framework has instead been suggested for its more emic approach (see Watkins & Gnoth, 2011a). Also, applications of 'non-Western' scales such as the Chinese Value Survey (Wong & Lau, 2001) remain exceptions in understanding the values of tourists from emerging markets.…”
Section: Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, found more differences than similarities in the behavioural patterns of Korean and Japanese tourists in Guam. Whilst many studies (Crotts & Litvin, 2003;Money & Crotts, 2003) rely on the etic framework of Hofstede's (1980) cultural value dimensions to investigate cross-cultural differences in tourist CB, Watkins and Gnoth (2011a) instead argue for a more emic approach, that of Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's (1961) value orientation theory, which does not force respondents to express their values within a restricted provided set.…”
Section: Cross-cultural Issues In Emerging Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture has long been regarded as a possible reason to explain why people of different countries make decisions differently (Ng, Lee, & Soutar, 2007). Along with the globalization of tourism economies, national culture has been incorporated as a key variable in an increasing number of tourism researches (refer to Crotts & Pizam, 2003;Fu, Lehto, & Cai, 2012;Watkins & Gnoth, 2011). These studies have attempted to reveal how culture accounts for tourist preferences and behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author argues that tourist perceptions of cleanliness and dirt can be used to mediate modernity, race, and the authenticity of cultural experiences. Furthermore, Watkins and Gnoth (2011) introduce a value orientation approach to understanding culture in tourism studies.…”
Section: Cultural Representation and Imagementioning
confidence: 99%