Imaging of the kidneys and upper urinary tract has traditionally relied upon the administration of intravascular, iodine‐based radiographic contrast agents. These contrast agents are not without drawbacks, however, and may cause renal damage, cardiopulmonary dysfunction, and allergic‐type reactions. Computed tomography (CT) has largely replaced the “single shot” intravenous urogram (IVU), except in unstable patients, because of the ability to accurately and rapidly delineate the majority of significant renal injuries. Renal contusions, intra‐ and extrarenal hematomas, renal lacerations and fractures, and urinary extravasation all can be reliably depicted with CT. The extent of parenchymal injury, minor laceration versus “shattered” kidney, as well as the size of a hematoma or collecting system injury are critical in determining whether urgent intervention is required or expectant management can be instituted. Extravasation of intravascular contrast on CT is an important clue to significant, ongoing bleeding. Further evaluation with angiography is usually indicated in this case, with the additional benefit that transcatheter embolization may be curative. Other imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear medicine can be considered for patients with a history of intravenous contrast allergy or preexisting renal dysfunction. These latter modalities also assume more important roles in the follow‐up of patients with posttraumatic renal tissue loss or hypertension.