2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state dependent impact of bank exposure on sovereign risk

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, e Yt could be a combination of technology, monetary policy, preferences and government expenditures. The inferential issues that arise when the break dates are misspecified is a topic that has not yet been explicitly analyzed in the identification-through-heteroskedasticity literature, and is the subject of future research Podstawski and Velinov (2018). Likewise, we do not have enough information to disentangle whether uncertainty shocks originate from economic policies and/or technology.5 We refer toLütkepohl (2013),Lütkepohl and Netšunajev (2017), andKilian and Lütkepohl (2017, chapter 14) for a review of this literature Chen and Netšunajev (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, e Yt could be a combination of technology, monetary policy, preferences and government expenditures. The inferential issues that arise when the break dates are misspecified is a topic that has not yet been explicitly analyzed in the identification-through-heteroskedasticity literature, and is the subject of future research Podstawski and Velinov (2018). Likewise, we do not have enough information to disentangle whether uncertainty shocks originate from economic policies and/or technology.5 We refer toLütkepohl (2013),Lütkepohl and Netšunajev (2017), andKilian and Lütkepohl (2017, chapter 14) for a review of this literature Chen and Netšunajev (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis, however, can be easily generalized to the case in which there are m structural breaks in the unconditional error covariance matrix, corresponding to m + 1 volatility regimes in the data. The inferential issues that arise when the break dates are misspecified is a topic that has not yet been explicitly analyzed in the identification-through-heteroskedasticity literature, and is the subject of future research Podstawski and Velinov (2018). have extended the identification approach we present and apply in this paper to the case in which the VAR parameters switch endogenously across volatility regimes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, Podstawski and Velinov (2018) also indicated that the destabilizing impact arising from banks' exposure to sovereign default risk in relatively less developed countries was evident. On the other hand, increased bank exposure was seen to have a stabilizing impact throughout extraordinary times for the countries less influenced by the crisisnamely, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria.…”
Section: Risk Management As a Matter Of Market Discipline And Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Analyzing the credit risk on the performance of 26 Turkish banks between 2005 and 2017, Ekinci and Poyraz (2019) stated that there is a correlation between credit risk management and productivity of Turkish deposit banks. Podstawski and Velinov (2018) define 'Credit Supply Channel', 'Implicit Bailout Channel', 'Portfolio Channel', 'Collateral Channel', 'Guarantee Channel', and 'Rating Channel' as contagion channels of the sovereign-bank nexus. Ghenimi et al (2017) investigated primary causes of banking fragility and concluded that credit risk and liquidity risk unconnectedly impact bank stability and that their interaction leads to instability.…”
Section: Macro-economic Risk and Loan Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, our analysis also takes into consideration possible endogeneity problems derived from adverse macroeconomic conditions (e.g., Angelini et al, 2017;Ghosh, 2017;Lakdawala et al, 2017) and the sovereign debt crisis, the so-called 'sovereign-bank nexus' (e.g., Altavilla et al, 2014;Buch et al, 2016;Li and Zinna, 2014;Podstawski and Velinov, 2018). 5 In some countries, the crisis has been originated in banks, and afterwards transmitted to governments, the so-called 'Irish style' crisis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%