1981
DOI: 10.1080/01944368108977101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spatial Dimension in the Planning of Social Services in Large Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I analyze the composition of poverty areas in the 100 largest central cities in 1980, drawing on special tabulations of the Census of Population (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1985). Ottensmann (1981) used similar data from 1970 to make the point that almost half of the poor in the 50 largest central cities were located outside poverty areas and that, on average, the composition of the poor population in poverty areas differed substantially from that of the poor in other central city neighborhoods. The central theses behind the analysis are that interurban variations are likely to exist in the nature as well as the intensity of urban poverty because of the differential imprint of economic and demographic change among cities and regions of the country, and that a knowledge of such variations is likely to be useful in moving the policy debate forward from generalized conceptions of urban poverty and in raising questions about the appropriateness of alternative public policies relating to urban poverty.…”
Section: Paul 1 Knoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I analyze the composition of poverty areas in the 100 largest central cities in 1980, drawing on special tabulations of the Census of Population (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1985). Ottensmann (1981) used similar data from 1970 to make the point that almost half of the poor in the 50 largest central cities were located outside poverty areas and that, on average, the composition of the poor population in poverty areas differed substantially from that of the poor in other central city neighborhoods. The central theses behind the analysis are that interurban variations are likely to exist in the nature as well as the intensity of urban poverty because of the differential imprint of economic and demographic change among cities and regions of the country, and that a knowledge of such variations is likely to be useful in moving the policy debate forward from generalized conceptions of urban poverty and in raising questions about the appropriateness of alternative public policies relating to urban poverty.…”
Section: Paul 1 Knoxmentioning
confidence: 99%