2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of the Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): A clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional and numeric output

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Arabic version of the Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP) (Aboraya et al, 2014) , a semi-structured diagnostic interview schedule was completed by all participants. Information gathered with the SCIP was used to assess psychiatric diagnostic exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Arabic version of the Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP) (Aboraya et al, 2014) , a semi-structured diagnostic interview schedule was completed by all participants. Information gathered with the SCIP was used to assess psychiatric diagnostic exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that among the initial textbook list, some belonged to a field aimed at researching psychotherapy and psychoanalysis—therefore promoting a broader signification of psychopathology. Although these books were not included, and considering that psychoanalytic psychopathology is different from descriptive psychopathology, it probably suggests that psychoanalysis has had some influence in Brazilian psychiatric practices, perhaps in a slightly different way than what occurred in the United States ( 33 , 56 , 57 ). The term “interview” has widespread use when referring to the diagnostic and therapeutic encounter with patients, including psychoanalytical sessions, which may add further confusion when searching for Psychiatric methods of MSE using indexed expressions, and which justifies the frequency of these textbooks in the initial search sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posiblemente la diferencia guarde relación con la forma de evaluación de los síntomas. La prevalencia de trastorno disminuye en forma importante cuando se evalúa con entrevista clínica (34). La prevalencia de síntomas emocionales es superior en los pacientes con enfermedades en situación de cronicidad, por ejemplo, Matte et al llevaron a cabo una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis y observaron que la prevalencia de depresión en la EPOC fue de 27.1% (IC95% 25.9-28.3) y en los controles de 10.0% (IC95% 9.2-10.8), es decir, que los pacientes con EPOC mostraron una frecuencia tres veces mayor de síntomas depresivos (OR=3.7; IC95% 2.4-5.9) (9).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified