Mental State Examination and Its Procedures—Narrative Review of Brazilian Descriptive Psychopathology

Abstract

Background: Mental State Examination (MSE) is compared with physical examination as a reliable method of objective data investigation. There is a growing concern with psychiatric clinics, nosology, and the reliability of diagnostic interview methods as a source of valid diagnostic strategy. Efforts to achieve an international diagnosis protocol have been unsuccessful or polemical. This paper focuses on psychopathology, MSE, and mental function development within Brazilian psychiatry over the last few decades.Methods: Searches, interviews, and narrative reviews were done to look for systematic ways in which to conduct MSE, mental functions, symptom clusters, orientations about data observation and records. Brazilian psychopathology textbooks were examined, if they provided access to consolidated knowledge on psychopathology examination.Results: Sixteen textbooks were selected from a 49 year span. Descriptive psychopathology with phenomenological orientation was the primary trend in the MSE. Concepts derived from different traditions, most lacking common terminology, suggested some divergence among authors. Recommendations for patient observation and how to collect objective data was clear, but MSE standardization efforts were missing. A detailed description of mental function abnormalities was the main MSE record strategy, without consensus about ways to summarize and record this data. In an examination summary, mental strata was divided into “mental functions,” and MSE subsets were frequent. All authors considered the following mental functions: consciousness, perception, thought, memory, attention, orientation, and volition.Discussion: Psychiatric competence demands MSE proficiency. Official documents are not clear about performance and recording standards. MSE data was usually recorded through descriptive psychopathology. A shift from detailed descriptive findings, to an array of observed pathological elements, described through a mental function checklist was observed over time. Clinical practice and research guidelines should consider the development of reliable MSE practices; however, it has been neglected by modern psychiatry/neuroscience through the excessive emphasis on interview protocols. Better MSE practices, and the improvement of bedside skill in psychiatry are necessary and depend on the recovery of psychopathological debates and semiological reasoning, which will allow the return of phenomenology-oriented “observational” techniques.

Aprendizado do Exame Psíquico por meio de metodologias lúdicas de ensino: Relato de experiência

“…Vale lembrar que tal tipo de exame não segue um modelo fixo, ou seja, para cada paciente, há a escolha de uma forma que se deseja empregar, resultando em variações (Rocha Neto et al, 2019). Elas podem ser entrevistas padronizadas (sejam objetivas ou discursivas) ou semi-padronizadas, sendo cada uma aplicada com o ritmo adequado ao paciente.…”

Application of mental status examination in homoeopathic prescribing

“…The specific cognitive functions of alertness, language, memory, constructional ability, and abstract reasoning are the most clinically relevant [1] . The Mental Status Examination (MSE) is a core element of the psychiatric assessment [2] . It is compared with physical examination as a reliable method of objective data investigation [3] .…”

History and Mental Status Examination in Primary Care in Saudi Arabia: A Review

“…There is currently a growing consensus about the need for a minimal structure for greater primary care reliability, as evidenced by a substantial bibliography on how to increase examiners' agreement about symptoms [5,6,7]. Because PE and MSE are logically associated, mental health practitioners frequently employ MSE as a substitute for PE from normal clinical examination and as a trustworthy way for acquiring objective data [8,9].…”