The Relationship Between Reaction Time and 60 m Performance in Elite Athletes

Gürses, Veli Volkan; Kamiş, Okan

doi:10.11114/jets.v6i12a.3931

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, Hurdle clearance plays an imperative role for good performance (2) .The correlations between all variables were positive significant (p<0.01) difference each other. Compared to the previous study (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) ,correlations of the approach run phase, hurdle unit phase, run-in phase were greater in the present study.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 91%

“…The results indicated that men had significant difference (p-value < 0.01) less time in Run-in than women. The results of current studies highly supported with previous https://www.indjst.org/ studies (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) .Hurdler clearance results revealed that women had Mean/SD (0.28±0.02) significant difference (p-value < 0.01) cross hurdle in less time than men (M/SD=0.35±0.03). Additionally, Hurdle clearance plays an imperative role for good performance (2) .The correlations between all variables were positive significant (p<0.01) difference each other.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…Most of the studies indicate that it is an essential factor which is being associated to the development of motor skill (speed, endurance, and strength). The significant methods and techniques which are connected to the clearance of ten hurdles also indicated in most of the studies (3)(4)(5)(6)(7) . Various jumping and running kinematics are complex form of hurdle technique (8) .In athletics three hurdler race events (110m-100m-400m] are most popular at international events (9) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A performance analysis about running sequence on male and female 60m hurdles

lowast¹,

Din²,

Shafqat³

et al. 2020

IJST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the running sequence of men and women, 60m (H) athletes World indoor athletics championship, Portland 2016. Methods: Sample of study was selected including eight finalist men (n=8) hurdlers and eight finalist women(n=8) hurdlers of this championship (M. age =26.0 years, SD = 2.45years), M. height = 185cm,SD=4.75cm), M. weight = 80.5kg, SD = 5.29kg) & women (M. age =27.7years, SD = 4.13 years), M. height = 168cm, SD = 3.97cm), M. Weight = 60.1kg, SD = 3.48kg). The researcher did performance analysis through video races of 60m (H), analyzing five variables; approach run phase & Intermediate timing, the hurdle unit phase, run in timing and hurdle clearance timing. Findings: The results of independent t.test revealed that men (n=8) hurdler had significant difference (p-value < 0.01) on Approach Run Phase than women and men had significant difference (p-value < 0.01) of hurdle unit phase HUP1, HUP2, HUP3 than women. The results also indicated that men had significant difference (p-value < 0.01) less time in Runin than women. Hurdler clearance results revealed that women had significant difference (p-value < 0.01) cross hurdle in less time than men.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A performance analysis about running sequence on male and female 60m hurdles

lowast¹,

Din²,

Shafqat³

et al. 2020

IJST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When it comes to the 200m discipline, it is considered that certain biomechanical factors, the so-called propulsive impulse, which was confirmed by research [2] by examining the hypothesis of the most favorable reaction force on the substrate during the initial acceleration, and the way to achieve it. Another very important factor is the level of speed endurance of athletes, which is increasingly paid attention during the training process, running techniques, and arises as a product of certain anaerobic processes in the body and good neuromuscular coordination, which was present in shorter sections [10]. The best examples of speed endurance are the C. Lemmetre and U. Bolt sprinters.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also in the men's final 100m (London) and 200m (Moscow) and 100m (Moscow) and 400m (London) no statistical differences were achieved in the start reaction time. Gürses, & Kamiş [10] examine the relationship between the results of the 60-meter sprint and the reaction time of 483 athletes who participated in the World Indoor Athletics Championships. A positive moderate correlation was found between the mean values of all 60m sprint results and the start reaction time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences of Results between Women’s and between Men’s Finalists in the Running, Jumping and Throwing Disciplines of the Finalists of the World Championships

Pavlović¹,

Petrović²,

Pupiš³

et al. 2020

AJSSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Worlds Athletics Championships, along with the Olympic Games, represent the largest review of athletes in which they record top results, often projecting new world records. Any research that analyzes top athletes contributes to shedding light on a number of issues. It is especially interesting to analyze and compare the results of athletes from one time distance. The main goal of the research was to determine the result differences in sprint, jumping and throwing disciplines, between men's and women's finalists participating in the World Athletics Championships in Edmonton, 2001 and Doha in 2019. Methods: the current study included a total of 493 finalists (247 men's and 246 women's) of the World Championships in Edmonton, 2001 and Doha, 2019. The results in sprint, jumping and throwing disciplines were analyzed in order to determine the result differences in the championship finals. To obtain the necessary information, a t-test for independent samples was applied and the relevant statistical parameters were calculated. Results: the results were confirmed between the final evident differences in all disciplines. Men in Edmonton were successful in 41% of the discipline (400m, pole vault, discus throw, hammer throw, javelin throw), and in Doha 59% of the discipline (100m, 200m, 110H, high jump, long jump, triple jump), while in the category of women's finalists, participants in Edmonton were successful in 17% of disciplines (long jump, throwing the ball), while female athletes were successful in 83% of disciplines (100m, 200m, 400m, 110H, triple jump, high jump, high jump with a pole, Throwing a spear, throwing a discus, throwing a hammer). Statistically significant differences between male finalists were recorded only in the disciplines: 200m (t=2.318; p<0.039) , throwing the ball (t=-2.939; p<0.009) and hammer throw (t=-2.802; p<0.013) , and in female finalists in the 200m disciplines (t=2.402; p<0.025) , pole vault (t=-5.552; p<0.000) and hammer throw (t=-6.410; p<0.000). Conclusion: the consequences of this distribution of differences finalist can be found in various morphological, motor and biomechanical parameters, technical experience, neuromuscular movements, level of motivation and preparedness at the time of onset and other endogenous-exogenous factors.

show abstract