2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychometric properties of the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ) in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Results concerning the factors of the CFQ support data from international studies that have used this instrument with the same aims (Birch et al, 2001;Camci et al, 2014;Carnell & Wardle, 2007;Corsini et al, 2008;Geng et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2012;Kasemsup & Reicks, 2006;Kong et al, 2015;Monnery-Patris et al, 2011;Montgomery et al, 2006;Mulder et al, 2009;Nowicka et al, 2014;O'Neill et al, 2005;Viana et al, 2012). The mean in our sample can be compared with the original research, which presented the following values in the respective factors PR (M = 3.4, SD = .95), PPW (M = 3.1, SD =.78), PCW (M = 2.9, SD = .50), CN (M = 2.3, SD = 1.15), RST (M = 4.0, SD = .78), PE (M = 2.5, SD = .95) and MN (M = 3.6, SD = .91; Birch et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results concerning the factors of the CFQ support data from international studies that have used this instrument with the same aims (Birch et al, 2001;Camci et al, 2014;Carnell & Wardle, 2007;Corsini et al, 2008;Geng et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2012;Kasemsup & Reicks, 2006;Kong et al, 2015;Monnery-Patris et al, 2011;Montgomery et al, 2006;Mulder et al, 2009;Nowicka et al, 2014;O'Neill et al, 2005;Viana et al, 2012). The mean in our sample can be compared with the original research, which presented the following values in the respective factors PR (M = 3.4, SD = .95), PPW (M = 3.1, SD =.78), PCW (M = 2.9, SD = .50), CN (M = 2.3, SD = 1.15), RST (M = 4.0, SD = .78), PE (M = 2.5, SD = .95) and MN (M = 3.6, SD = .91; Birch et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The English version of the original CFQ by Birch et al (2001) has been translated into many contexts: Portuguese of Portugal by Viana et al (2012), Turkish by Camci, Bas, and Buyukkaragoz (2014), Australian by Corsini, Danthiir, Kettler, and Wilson (2008), Japanese by Geng et al (2009), French by Monnery-Patris et al (2011) and Swedish by Nowicka, Sorjonen, Pietrobelli, Flodmark, and Faith (2014). All these versions show good factorial validity, reporting a stable factor solution for the total CFQ and for the seven subscales, reliability and also satisfactory internal consistency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Previous studies analyzed the CFQ validation in several populations. 7,15,[20][21][22][23] These studies found that the original model presented by Birch et al 15 was not sufficiently clear for their population samples and that RST was a problematic subscale. Consequently, each study proposed its own factor structures (Table 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Bu araştırma, ÇBA'nın Türk okul çağı çocuklarının ebeveynlerinde yapılan güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışmaları arasında doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanan ilk çalışmadır (15,16). Çalışma sonuçlarımız ÇBA'nın Türkçe formunun güvenilir ve geçerli bir araç olduğunu göstermek-tedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified