The Modern Global Financial System: Social Risks Vs. Technological Risks

Popkova, Elena G.; Fetisova, Olga V.; Zabaznova, Tatyana A.; Alferova, Tatiana

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_107

Cited by 13 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time, international and state efforts do not ensure an unambiguous positive human rights outcome, and violation of individual rights and freedoms is still relevant in the aspect of prevention and restoration. Modern destruction, including humanitarian, is increasingly associated with a risk factor (Makarova, 2017, Popkova, et al 2018, Beck, 2009. It is believed that it is the axiology of man, his rights and freedoms that focuses on the search for new directions that ensure the proper state of the person in risky conditions.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risks to the Human Rights Advocacy in African Constitutions

Markhgeym¹,

Aristov²,

Bezuglya³

et al. 2022

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents the results of a comparative legal study of the texts of the constitutions of African states with a view to identifying the rules that minimize human rights risks. The research is based on a dialectical approach to the disclosure of legal phenomena and processes using general scientific (systematic and logical methods, analysis and synthesis) and specific scientific methods. African constitutions, in comparison with the constitutions of other states, and in particular European ones, contain a disproportionately large number of rules formalizing special human rights institutions. Typically, these are special councils, human rights commissions (Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia) or certain categories of the population (three in Egypt, three in Morocco, one in the Central African Republic). In Morocco and Equatorial Guinea, both the Mediator and the Public Defender are established, respectively. The relevance of the study is due to the strategic objectives of creating a secure human rights status of the state, as well as the need to find and update theoretical, methodological, and practical approaches to protecting the rights and freedoms of a human and a citizen. Considering the rules of the African constitutional model of minimizing risks to human right advocacy, objectively in terms of quantity and quality, are considered hyperbolic.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risks to the Human Rights Advocacy in African Constitutions

Markhgeym¹,

Aristov²,

Bezuglya³

et al. 2022

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The social aspect of sustainable development as a process of provision of society's balance is studied in the works Au (2019), Eustachio et al (2019), Naderi et al (2019), Nayak et al (2019), Tacon (2019), Thakhathi (2019), and Yang et al (2019). The issues of socio-economic inequality are studied in the works Agunovich et al (2018), D'Aleo and Sergi (2017), Goyal et al (2015, 2017), Popkova and French (2017), Popkova et al (2017, 2018, 2019), Popkova and Gulzat (2020), Popkova and Zmiyak (2019), Popkova and Sergi (2018), Pritvorova et al (2018), Qerimi and Sergi (2015), Ragulina (2019), Ragulina et al (2019), Sergi et al (2019a, b), Shevyakova and Petrenko (2018) and Shevyakova et al (2019).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socio-economic inequality as a barrier on the path of sustainable development: “institutional traps” and perspectives of overcoming them

Абашидзе

Inshakova

Солнцев

et al. 2020

IJSSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to study the problem of socio-economic inequality from the positions of the neo-institutional economic theory, to determine the causal connections of emergence and manifestation of this problem as a barrier on the path of sustainable development and to develop institutional measures for its solution based on state regulation.Design/methodology/approachThe scientific and methodological basis of this research is based on regression analysis, which is used for creating and analyzing the regression curves. For the fullest coverage of countries of the world and provision of high representation of the research results, the objects of the research are countries from each category that were distinguished according to their position in the global rating of countries as to the index of sustainable development, calculated and compiled by Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2019).FindingsIt is substantiated that financial inequality is a result of violation of the principles of social justice—primarily, in the labor market. The institutional approach, which is used for studying the problem of socio-economic inequality, allows presenting this problem as a result of the action of social institutes with own system of rules and norms and offering the institutional measures of regulation, which are to influence the rules and norms in society in the labor market. Due to this, the object of regulation is not the consequence but the reasons—and better and long-term results are achieved.Originality/valueIt is proved that social justice is the key condition of overcoming socio-economic inequality, formation of inclusive society and achievement of balance of the global economic system—thus opening a path to sustainable development. Four “institutional traps” are determined, which establish the practices of violation of the principles of social justice in the system of norms and rules of behavior of the labor market's participants. The authors determine perspectives and directions and offer measures of state regulation of the institutes of socio-economic inequality for its overcoming and provision of sustainable development of national economy and the global economy.

show abstract

“…The foundations and applied solutions for building social market economy in the modern economic systems are studied in the works Au (2019), Felice and Krienke (2017), Goyal and Sergi (2015), Goyal et al (2017), Guizzo and Vigo de Lima (2017), Jędrzejowska-Schiffauer (2017), Morozova et al (2019), Naderi et al (2019), Nayak et al (2019), Popkova and Sergi (2020), Popkova et al (2017, 2018, 2019) and Popkova and Gulzat (2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of social market economy under the influence of noneconomic factors: modeling and regulation

Inshakova

Frolova

Galkinа

et al. 2020

IJSSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to model and develop recommendations for regulating the development of social market economy under the influence of noneconomic factors.Design/methodology/approachThe authors determine the existing examples of social market economies, in which quality of life clearly correlates with economic growth – and the research objects are thus determined. Then, the list of noneconomic factors, which could be quantitatively characterized based on the official statistics, is formed. The econometric model of dependence of the rate of economic growth of the selected noneconomic factors is created, and it is determined at which combination of these factors' influence it is possible to reach the target rate of economic growth of social market economy. Data are processed automatically by compiling the descriptive statistics and conducting regression analysis within the method of imitation modeling and multiparametric nonlinear optimization.FindingsIt is shown that, unlike the classical market economy (pure capitalism), in which economic factors dominate, social market economy (mixture of capitalism and socialism) is also influenced by noneconomic factors. This changes the view on economic growth as one of the most significant processes in the economic practice and one of the key research objects in economics. It is substantiated that there's a necessity not for micro- (as in the classical market economy) but for macroeconomic view on economic growth through the prism of factors that are external to entrepreneurship.Originality/valueThe results of imitation modeling allowed reducing the uncertainty and reflecting the specifics of economic growth of social market economy. The compiled model of multiple linear regression allowed narrowing down the circle and outlining four main noneconomic factors of economic growth of social market economy. The authors' recommendations for regulation of these factors are offered, and a mechanism of regulation of development of social market economy based on noneconomic factors management is offered.

show abstract

The Modern Global Financial System: Social Risks Vs. Technological Risks

Cited by 13 publications

References 15 publications

Risks to the Human Rights Advocacy in African Constitutions

Risks to the Human Rights Advocacy in African Constitutions

Socio-economic inequality as a barrier on the path of sustainable development: “institutional traps” and perspectives of overcoming them

Development of social market economy under the influence of noneconomic factors: modeling and regulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About