2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4257-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The method ADAMONT v1.0 for statistical adjustment of climate projections applicable to energy balance land surface models

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce the method ADAMONT v1.0 to adjust and disaggregate daily climate projections from a regional climate model (RCM) using an observational dataset at hourly time resolution. The method uses a refined quantile mapping approach for statistical adjustment and an analogous method for sub-daily disaggregation. The method ultimately produces adjusted hourly time series of temperature, precipitation, wind speed, humidity, and short-and longwave radiation, which can in turn be used to force any ene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study uses the EURO-CORDEX dataset Kotlarski et al, 2014) for climate projections consisting of six regional climate models (RCMs) forced by five different global climate models (GCMs) from the CMIP5 ensemble (Taylor et al, 2012) over Europe, for the historical, RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios (Moss et al, 2010). All EURO-CORDEX data were adjusted using the ADA-MONT method (Verfaillie et al, 2017) using the SAFRAN data as the reference observation dataset . Historical runs generally cover the period 1950-2005 and climate projections (RCPs) cover the period 2006-2100 (Table 1).…”
Section: Climate Forcing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study uses the EURO-CORDEX dataset Kotlarski et al, 2014) for climate projections consisting of six regional climate models (RCMs) forced by five different global climate models (GCMs) from the CMIP5 ensemble (Taylor et al, 2012) over Europe, for the historical, RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios (Moss et al, 2010). All EURO-CORDEX data were adjusted using the ADA-MONT method (Verfaillie et al, 2017) using the SAFRAN data as the reference observation dataset . Historical runs generally cover the period 1950-2005 and climate projections (RCPs) cover the period 2006-2100 (Table 1).…”
Section: Climate Forcing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work aims at producing snow reliability investigations of a wide range of ski resorts in France (Alps and Pyrenees), Spain and Andorra under past and future conditions using state-of-the-art snowpack modelling. We accounted for snow grooming and snowmaking using a detailed snowpack model (Spandre et al, 2016b) and used adjusted and downscaled climate projections from the EURO-CORDEX dataset (Verfaillie et al, 2017 to compute snow reliability elevations with distinct levels of snow reliability requirements. The mean elevation of residential population in a ski resort (Breiling and Charamza, 1999) and the mean elevation of ski lifts (Falk and Vanat, 2016) were compared to the snow reliability line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also be due to the fact that Crocus model outputs result 5 from the interaction between various meteorological variables, both in terms of mean values but also their day to day variations, especially precipitation and temperature conditions which together yield either to rain or snow precipitation. By design, the ADAMONT method adjusts the variables independently from each other (Verfaillie et al, 2017). Even if special care is taken to minimize the disadvantages of this approach, such as the use of weather regimes for the quantile mapping statistical adjustment method, or the final quantile mapping applied to rain and snow precipitation separately to mitigate temperature/precipitation 10 detrimental interactions (Verfaillie et al, 2017), some interaction terms probably remain uncorrected.…”
Section: On the Comparability Between Adjusted Historical Climate Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By design, the ADAMONT method adjusts the variables independently from each other (Verfaillie et al, 2017). Even if special care is taken to minimize the disadvantages of this approach, such as the use of weather regimes for the quantile mapping statistical adjustment method, or the final quantile mapping applied to rain and snow precipitation separately to mitigate temperature/precipitation 10 detrimental interactions (Verfaillie et al, 2017), some interaction terms probably remain uncorrected. The adjustment method also probably exerts an influence on the variability during the historical period, which may be responsible for the overall lower spread (either expressed in terms of quantile-based coefficient of variation of annual values or the coefficient of variation of the interannual means) compared to future projections.…”
Section: On the Comparability Between Adjusted Historical Climate Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation