2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of airport competition on technical efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis applied to Italian airport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This dataset provides information about estimated population density for the EU27, Croatia and Moldova at a pixel size of one hectare. This is a level of detail much higher than the NUTS 3 level used in previous analyses (e.g., Redondi et al, 2013;Scotti et al, 2012;Lieshout, 2012;Papatheodorou and Arvanitis, 2009;Grosche et al, 2007). Table 1 shows the substantial improvement in terms of data disaggregation that CORINE represents over the NUTS units.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This dataset provides information about estimated population density for the EU27, Croatia and Moldova at a pixel size of one hectare. This is a level of detail much higher than the NUTS 3 level used in previous analyses (e.g., Redondi et al, 2013;Scotti et al, 2012;Lieshout, 2012;Papatheodorou and Arvanitis, 2009;Grosche et al, 2007). Table 1 shows the substantial improvement in terms of data disaggregation that CORINE represents over the NUTS units.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…European studies considering population in the catchment area usually take the NUTS 3 level 1 to aggregate population values around the airport (e.g., Papatheodorou and Arvanitis, 2009;Grosche et al, 2007). Two recent studies use lower levels of data aggregation than NUTS 3, Redondi et al (2013) use municipality level units and Scotti et al (2012) use zip codes, both represent an advance. Nevertheless, when aggregating point-based geospatial values e such as population e into pre-defined districts, results are influenced by the choice of the district boundaries, which becomes a source of statistical bias.…”
Section: Introduction: the Modifiable Area Unit Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Gillen and Lall, 1997) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) (e.g. see Scotti et al, 2012). Both techniques are valid and have been fruitfully applied in the context of transport geography (see Grubesic and Wei, 2012;Martin and Roman, 2001;and Tapiador et al, 2008 for examples of DEA application); yet, they do not consider risk at least explicitly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first refers to parametric methods, such as stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), which measure efficiency through econometric techniques [10,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. The second comprises investigations applying the non-parametric methodology called DEA [13,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Dea Studies In the Air Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deregulation process in Europe has followed four steps [8][9][10], which have led to a unique domestic market throughout the countries. The last step has taken place in 2008 when, due to the Regulation (EC) No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%