2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Cooperative Method Embedded in a Writing Strategy Instructional Program on Student Engagement in School

Abstract: Cooperative methods are a powerful tool for improving both student engagement in school and writing competence. This study examined the effects of a cooperative method embedded in a writing strategy instructional program on student engagement in school, namely on their cognitive, affective, behavioral, and personal agency dimensions. Using the Students' Engagement in School: Four-dimensional Scale (SES-4DS), 213 ninth grade students (from 14 to 17 years old) were evaluated before and after the intervention. Tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further elements about the psychometric properties of the instrument used are as follows: cognitive, CR = .75, AVE = .53, McDonald's (omega) = .71; affective, CR = .82, AVE = .59, McDonald's = .79; behavioral, CR = .91, AVE = .49, McDonald's = .90; and agentic, CR = .88, AVE = .53 and McDonald's = .87. These values are similar to those found in precedent studies with the SES-4DS (Prata, Festas, Oliveira, & Veiga, 2019;Veiga, 2016. Gender invariance in the SES-4DS was tested and the values obtained (such as ∆ CFI .01) were lower than the threshold indicated by Cheung and Rensvold (2002).…”
Section: Student Engagementsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further elements about the psychometric properties of the instrument used are as follows: cognitive, CR = .75, AVE = .53, McDonald's (omega) = .71; affective, CR = .82, AVE = .59, McDonald's = .79; behavioral, CR = .91, AVE = .49, McDonald's = .90; and agentic, CR = .88, AVE = .53 and McDonald's = .87. These values are similar to those found in precedent studies with the SES-4DS (Prata, Festas, Oliveira, & Veiga, 2019;Veiga, 2016. Gender invariance in the SES-4DS was tested and the values obtained (such as ∆ CFI .01) were lower than the threshold indicated by Cheung and Rensvold (2002).…”
Section: Student Engagementsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…One important implication from this study is that immigrant adolescents need specific support, especially in early adolescence, to improve cognitive engagement (self-regulatory and learning abilities), and agentic engagement (to show initiative and to make proposals). School psychologists can consider these processes and contexts in a joint work with teachers and parents throughout adolescence (Eric & Yu-Lung, 2016;Luengen et al, 2021;Özdemir et al, 2021;Prata et al, 2019;Reeve & Shin, 2020;Veiga et al, 2009). Supports that encourage a shift from stagnant to increased engagement for students over the course of adolescence are proposed (Council of Europe, 2016;Covell et al, 2017;OECD, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas experiencing helpful peers may be a fleeting, superficial interaction, regularly socializing with a few close friends is more meaningful and has a deeper, lasting impact on the development of an adolescent, which includes their propensity to engage in deviant behaviors. The extant literature on adolescent development details the strong influence peers have on areas of adolescent development such as self-concept, academic aptitude, and deviant behavior [25,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers several benefits to boost students' learning. Based on the findings from Navarro-Pablo and Gallardo-Saborido (2015), Gillies et al (2016), Prata et al (2019) cooperative learning model is recognized as an effective learning model and sound pedagogical approach to promote and socialize learning among students in any level of education. This model allows the learner to collaborate to achieve the shared goal and work together to achieve the goal that they cannot achieve if they work individually.…”
Section: Cooperative Learning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%