2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00183.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The family Alestidae (Ostariophysi, Characiformes): a phylogenetic analysis of a trans-Atlantic clade

Abstract: The overall most parsimonious hypothesis of relationships based on 200 characters indicates that the Alestidae is the closest relative of Chalceus, a genus previously assigned to the Neotropical Characidae. Chalceus is shifted into the Alestidae, which becomes the only trans‐Atlantic family level group within the Characiformes. Various previously proposed suprageneric assemblages within the Alestidae (e.g. Petersiini) failed to delimit monophyletic groups under the intrafamilial phylogenetic analysis. The eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
251
1
18

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
10
251
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most characid fishes are endemic to South America, some of their close relatives in the family Alestidae, order Characiformes, occur in both Africa and South America (Zanata and Vari, 2005), leading biogeographers to hypothesize that the most recent common ancestor of all characiforms inhabited the supercontinent of Gondwanaland before its tectonic plates began to drift apart about 120 million years ago (Lundberg, 1993;Ortí, 1997;Zanata and Vari, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most characid fishes are endemic to South America, some of their close relatives in the family Alestidae, order Characiformes, occur in both Africa and South America (Zanata and Vari, 2005), leading biogeographers to hypothesize that the most recent common ancestor of all characiforms inhabited the supercontinent of Gondwanaland before its tectonic plates began to drift apart about 120 million years ago (Lundberg, 1993;Ortí, 1997;Zanata and Vari, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the counts of fin rays, lower case Roman numerals indicate unbranched rays, and Arabic numerals indicate branched rays. Nomenclature mostly follows Weitzman (1962), with some modifications suggested by subsequent authors (Fink & Fink, 1981;1996;Zanata &Vari, 2005): mesethmoid instead of ethmoid, vomer instead of prevomer, epioccipital instead of epiotic, endopterygoid instead of mesopterygoid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First unbranched dorsal-fin ray less that half-length of second, following branched rays gradually decreasing in size posteriorly. Presence of small ossification associated with first proximal dorsal-fin radial (character 124, described by Zanata, Vari, 2005). First unbranched ray of dorsalfin inserted in first pterygiophore and last two branched rays inserted in tenth pterygiophore.…”
Section: Conservation Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorsal fin with 10(5) pterygiophores. Presence of small ossification associated with first proximal dorsal-fin radial (character 124, described by Zanata, Vari, 2005). Proximal radial of first pterygiophore of dorsal fin posterior to neural spine of ninth precaudal vertebra.…”
Section: Figs 1-5mentioning
confidence: 99%