No abstract

The family Characidae is a group of freshwater bony fishes that exhibits high species-level diversity and whose members inhabit parts of Texas, Mexico, and Central and South America. Thus far, morphological data have been of limited use in discerning relationships among subfamilies and incertae sedis genera of the family Characidae. In this study, DNA sequence data from GenBank were combined with new sequences for analyses under Bayesian and parsimony schemes. Sequences fell into four gene partitions, with three genes in the mitochondrial subset (12S, 16S, COI genes) and one gene in the nuclear subset (RAG2 gene). Inferred Bayesian and parsimony-based phylogenies reject the monophyly of certain groups (e.g., Astyanax, Hyphessobrycon, and Bryconamericus), do not reject the monophyly of others (e.g., Cheirodontinae and "clade A" of previous authors), and present new sister-group hypotheses (e.g., Brittanichthys sister to Paracheirodon). Sister to clade A is a lineage referred to herein as "clade B" which includes Exodon and exemplars from Cheirodontinae (the most basal lineage within clade B), Aphyocharacinae, Tetragonopterinae, and Characinae (excluding Gnathocharax). "Clade C" is sister to A+B and contains representatives of large incertae sedis genera (e.g., Hyphessobrycon, Hemigrammus), as well as members of Stethaprioninae. Unless certain other subfamilial names are to be disregarded, the use of Tetragonopterinae should continue to be restricted to species of Tetragonopterus because other genera previously referred to this subfamily grouped in clades A or C, quite distant from Tetragonopterus.

No abstract

The systematics of the Glandulocaudinae is reviewed in detail and justification for the recognition of the group as a subfamily is discussed. The subfamily Glandulocaudinae consists of three genera: Lophiobrycon with one species plesiomorphic in some anatomical features but some others exclusively derived relative to the species in the other genera; Glandulocauda with two species intermediate in phylogenetic derivation; and Mimagoniates with seven species (one new), all more phylogenetically derived concerning their pheromone producing caudal-fin organs and with other anatomical characters presumably more derived than in the species of the other genera. Glandulocauda melanogenys Eigenmann, 1911, is considered a junior synonym of Hyphessobrycon melanopleurus Ellis, 1911. A replacement name, Glandulocauda caerulea Menezes & Weitzman, is proposed for G. melanopleura Eigenmann, 1911. Gland cells found in the caudal-fin organs of all species are histologically indistinguishable from club cells and probably secrete a pheromone during courtship. The club cells are associated with somewhat modified to highly derived caudal scales forming a pheromone pumping organ in the more derived genera and species. This subfamily is distributed in freshwaters of eastern and southern Brazil, Paraguay, and northeastern Uruguay.
A sistemática de Glandulocaudinae é revista e a justificativa para o reconhecimento do grupo como subfamília discutida. A subfamília Glandulocaudinae consiste de três gêneros: Lophiobrycon, com uma espécie plesiomórfica com relação a alguns caracteres anatômicos, mas outros derivados e exclusivos em relação às espécies dos outros dois gêneros; Glandulocauda, com duas espécies intermediárias quanto à condição dos caracteres derivados; e Mimagoniates, com sete espécies (uma nova), todas filogeneticamente mais avançadas quanto às características dos órgãos da nadadeira caudal produtores de feromônio e outras características anatômicas presumivelmente mais derivadas do que nas espécies dos outros gêneros. Glandulocauda melanogenys Eigenmann, 1911, é considerado sinônimo junior de Hyphessobrycon melanopleurus Ellis, 1911. O nome Glandulocauda caerulea Menezes & Weitzman, é proposto em substiutição para G. melanopleura Eigenmann, 1911. Células glandulares encontradas nos órgãos da caudal são histologicamente indistinguíveis de "células club" e provavelmente secretam algum tipo de feromônio durante a corte. As "células club" são associadas a escamas da caudal pouco ou inteiramente modificadas e fazendo parte dos órgãos bombeadores de feromônio nas espécies e gêneros mais derivados. Esta subfamília distribui-se em ambientes de água doce do leste e sul do Brasil, no Paraguai e nordeste do Uruguai

In this report, the gonads of 32 glandulocaudine species, representing 18 genera, are compared with 11 outgroup characiform species. Through the presence of spermatozoa within the ovarian cavity, internal fertilization of the female is confirmed for the 16 genera for which mature ovaries were available. No outgroup ovary studied contains spermatozoa. All mature glandulocaudine testes have a large portion of the posterior testis, which is devoid of developing germ cells and spermatocysts (aspermatogenic), devoted to sperm storage, with the degree of partitioning in that region varying greatly within the group. All outgroup species examined have spermatozoa with spherical nuclei. With the exception of the species of the genus Planaltina, which also have spherical nuclei, all glandulocaudines have elongated nuclei, which vary among the species from 3.6 μm to 31.6 μm in length. Distinct sperm packets (spermatozeugmata) are formed in five genera by two different methods. In the genera Xenurobrycon, Tyttocharax, and Scopaeocharax, all of the tribe Xenurobryconini, the spermatozeugmata are formed within the spermatocysts and released fully formed. In all genera of the tribe Glandulocaudini, which includes Glandulocauda and Mimagoniates, loose spermatozoa are released which cluster into spermatozeugmata within the posterior storage areas. These morphological specializations are discussed within a phylogenetic framework as adaptations for internal fertilization and are hypothesized to be independently derived. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

No abstract

As part of an effort to characterize reproductive modifications in internally inseminating catfishes, ovaries and male reproductive systems were examined histologically in two species of auchenipterid catfishes, Trachelyopterus lucenai and T. galeatus, from southeastern Brazil. Internal insemination was documented in both species by the presence of sperm within ovaries. Although there is some variation in gross morphology of the male reproductive systems between the two species, both have four main regions: spermatogenic lobes, sperm storage regions, and secretory and storage regions of the seminal vesicle. In both species, the anterior portion of the reproductive system is spermatogenic and divided into numerous finger‐like lobes. Posterior to the spermatogenic area is the storage region of the seminal vesicle, a large median structure with a honeycomb‐like appearance. This region is consistently larger in T. lucenai. Attached to the storage region of the seminal vesicle in both species are secretory lobes comprised of tubules lined by secretory cells. These lobes in T. lucenai are small and located on the anterior aspect of the storage region of the seminal vesicle, whereas in T. galeatus the lobes are much larger and located laterally. The sperm storage regions of T. lucenai consist of two large lobes located ventral to the storage region of the seminal vesicle. Highly compact sperm packets (spermatozeugmata) fill the lumina of the ramifying tubules of these regions. Each spermatozeugma consists of elongate nuclei tightly arranged parallel to one another. In T. galeatus two distinct sperm storage regions are present. Just posterior to the spermatogenic lobes a series of small lobes serve as anterior sperm storage regions. Posterior to the secretory lobes of the seminal vesicle is a series of lobes, at the most posterior aspect of the reproductive tract, that serve as posterior sperm storage regions. Both are identical, histologically, to the sperm storage regions of T. lucenai. An absence of compact spermatozeugmata in the T. galeatus specimens may be related to variations in their sexual activity. The descriptions presented here allow for consistent terminology for comparison of regions of the male reproductive system based on presumed function. J. Morphol. 246:131–141, 2000 © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

No abstract