1991
DOI: 10.1920/re.ifs.1991.0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European carbon tax: an assessment of the European Commission's proposals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has not been possible to analyse the effects of this compensation on the spending of these specific groups, but it has been possible to treat them as if they behaved in the same way as the average consumer. From IFS work on taxation of fuels (Pearson and Smith, 1991), this is rather unlikely, but the effect is a second-order one working through the composition of consumers' expenditures which is unlikely to have much effect on the results reported here. The overall results for the VAT/road fuel duty scenario are largely unaffected, except that the net PSBR reduction is smaller.…”
Section: Special Compensationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It has not been possible to analyse the effects of this compensation on the spending of these specific groups, but it has been possible to treat them as if they behaved in the same way as the average consumer. From IFS work on taxation of fuels (Pearson and Smith, 1991), this is rather unlikely, but the effect is a second-order one working through the composition of consumers' expenditures which is unlikely to have much effect on the results reported here. The overall results for the VAT/road fuel duty scenario are largely unaffected, except that the net PSBR reduction is smaller.…”
Section: Special Compensationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…En ce qui concerne ce troisième type de second dividende, Pearson et Smith [1991], Smith [1992] Ballard et al [1985] ou Nordhaus [1991]). En l absence d études comparables pour l Europe ou la France, on peut remarquer avec Ekins [1997] que les distorsions fiscales y sont au moins aussi importantes qu aux USA, dans la mesure où le poids des prélèvements obligatoires est dans la Communauté européenne supérieur de 50% à celui des États-Unis ou du Japon, et qu il n y a aucune raison de penser que le système fiscal européen soit plus efficace que le système fiscal américain.…”
Section: De L Importance De La Définition Du Double Dividendeunclassified
“…Vgl. Barker, Köhler (1998), 382-385;Pearson, Smith (1993), 41-44, und für die USA Dornbusch, Poterba (1991), 78-80. ersten Reformstufe am ausgabefähigen Haushaltseinkommen bzw. -Konsum (Abbildungen 4 und 5) sowie über alle Reformstufen (Abbildungen 6 und 7).…”
Section: Lastenmaßstab Gruppierungskriteriumunclassified