2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of global excess liquidity on emerging stock market returns: Evidence from a panel threshold model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the central bank is the liquidity provider at the end (Garcia‐de‐Andoain, Heider, Hoerova, & Manganelli, 2016), such an empirical exercise allows to unravel liquidity conditions in the system with more precision and to identify whether liquidity matters for the stock market. In that way, our study contributes to the strand of literature that provides a link between liquidity and financial markets (Bernanke & Kuttner, 2005; Brana & Prat, 2016; Nyborg & Östberg, 2014). In addition, our study employs daily data, which help in capturing more information and better return predictability (Bollerslev & Wright, 2001; Narayan, Narayan, & Sharma, 2013; Narayan & Sharma, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the central bank is the liquidity provider at the end (Garcia‐de‐Andoain, Heider, Hoerova, & Manganelli, 2016), such an empirical exercise allows to unravel liquidity conditions in the system with more precision and to identify whether liquidity matters for the stock market. In that way, our study contributes to the strand of literature that provides a link between liquidity and financial markets (Bernanke & Kuttner, 2005; Brana & Prat, 2016; Nyborg & Östberg, 2014). In addition, our study employs daily data, which help in capturing more information and better return predictability (Bollerslev & Wright, 2001; Narayan, Narayan, & Sharma, 2013; Narayan & Sharma, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Hamburger and Kochin (1972), Chudik and Fratzscher (2011), Florackis, Kontonikas, and Kostakis (2014), and Brana and Prat (2016) are the other studies that argue a positive relationship between liquidity and stock prices in both advanced and emerging economies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kiendrebeogo (2016) has also shown that the US Fed has exerted greater effects in terms of net portfolio flows on emerging economies than on developed economies. Furthermore, Brana and Prat (2016) demonstrated that excess capital flows affect stock prices in emerging markets in a positive direction. Fratzscher et al (2017) revealed that non-conventional US monetary practices affected Emerging Market Economies (EMEs) only modestly.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with Rey (2015) and Bruno and Shin (2015) who found a negative relationship between the global financial cycle and credit growth. In addition, Brana & Prat (2016) found empirical evidence of the impact of global liquidity excess on equity prices by using threshold panel models for 17 developing countries. The excess global liquidity reflects the global financial cycle and the VIX index is used as a measure of global investor sentiment.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, global financial factors can also be linked to US monetary policy conditions through risk-taking. Brana & Prat (2016) studied the importance of global risk aversion in transmitting global financial fluctuations in the financial markets of EMEs. Excess liquidity as a result of loose monetary policy will affect the return on equity depending on risk aversion behavior of foreign investors.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%