2009
DOI: 10.2746/042516409x371387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of rising and sitting trot on back movements and head‐neck position of the horse

Abstract: The back movement during rising trot showed characteristics of both sitting trot and the unloaded condition. As the same maximal extension of the back is reached during rising and sitting trot, there is no reason to believe that rising trot was less challenging for the back.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balanced horses are equally flexible on both reins 25 , whereas asymmetric horses load their limbs unevenly, thus being at higher risk of injury 23,30 . However, the weight of the rider has been proved to create asymmetry of gait to some extent [48][49][50] . In particular during rising trot, horses show a greater degree of lateral bend than in a natural trot sequence without a rider 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Balanced horses are equally flexible on both reins 25 , whereas asymmetric horses load their limbs unevenly, thus being at higher risk of injury 23,30 . However, the weight of the rider has been proved to create asymmetry of gait to some extent [48][49][50] . In particular during rising trot, horses show a greater degree of lateral bend than in a natural trot sequence without a rider 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the weight of the rider has been proved to create asymmetry of gait to some extent [48][49][50] . In particular during rising trot, horses show a greater degree of lateral bend than in a natural trot sequence without a rider 50 . In total, the load on the left fore/right hind sitting diagonal is larger than that of the opposite sitting diagonal 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Cocq et al . (2009) found that the flexion‐extension angles of C1 without a rider had a larger range than with the rider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lumbar back: Since the rider moves down relatively more during the sitting stance compared to the nonsitting the horse has to cope with the larger downward impulse from the rider and then push the rider up again. This results in increased vertical loading during half of the stride cycle (de Cocq et al 2008) and can explain why the lumbar back is lower between the mid-stances of the sitting and the nonsitting diagonal stance (when at least one diagonal limb is at stance).…”
Section: Interstride Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%