2012
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Removing Potentially Infectious Dogs on the Numbers of Canine Leishmania infantum Infections in an Endemic Area with High Transmission Rates

Abstract: Abstract. To assess the effect of the rapid removal of potentially infectious dogs on the prevalence and incidence of canine infections, a prospective study was undertaken in an area endemic for Leishmania infantum. We used serological testing based on the rapid DPP rK28 fusion protein chromatographic immunoassay for this dog screening-and-culling intervention trial. The outcome was evaluated by measuring seropositivity and sero-conversion/-reversion rates for canine infection. Our estimates indicated that con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One control measure taken by the VLCSP that has had little impact is the elimination of the canine reservoir, and this failure has been ascribed to delays in detecting and eliminating infected dogs, the tendency to replace infected dogs with susceptible puppies, and the low sensitivity of the available serological methods [33][34]. Furthermore, the effectiveness euthanasia of seropositive dog in controlling VL is widely questioned [35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One control measure taken by the VLCSP that has had little impact is the elimination of the canine reservoir, and this failure has been ascribed to delays in detecting and eliminating infected dogs, the tendency to replace infected dogs with susceptible puppies, and the low sensitivity of the available serological methods [33][34]. Furthermore, the effectiveness euthanasia of seropositive dog in controlling VL is widely questioned [35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the efficacy of dog culling as a unique control measure for both human and canine visceral leishmaniasis remains controversial (Dietze et al 1997, Ashford et al 1998, Courtenay et al 2002, Grimaldi et al 2012. In endemic areas, fast dog replacement by owners in houses where infected dogs have been eliminated may play an important role for maintenance of the disease (Nunes et al 2008).…”
Section: Visceral Leishmaniais (Vl) Caused By Leishmania (Leishmania)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VLCSP mainly relies on the euthanasia of seropositive dogs to control VL; however, this measure is controversial and some reports suggest that it has little impact on the reduction of human and canine cases [11][13]. This failure has been attributed to delays in detecting and eliminating infected dogs, the tendency to replace infected dogs with susceptible puppies, and the low sensitivity of the serological methods used [14][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%