2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of diffusion and overhangs/vacancies on the microstructure of zig-zag thin film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the refractive index decreases with increasing glancing angle. The minimum refractive index is found to be 2.03 for the helical CuIn 5 S 8 film A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13 deposited at an angle of 85°. The Urbach energy was found to increase from 0.29 to 0.5 eV as α rises from 0° to 85° which may be correlated with an increase of the density of defects in the highest porous structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results showed that the refractive index decreases with increasing glancing angle. The minimum refractive index is found to be 2.03 for the helical CuIn 5 S 8 film A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13 deposited at an angle of 85°. The Urbach energy was found to increase from 0.29 to 0.5 eV as α rises from 0° to 85° which may be correlated with an increase of the density of defects in the highest porous structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…23 Simulations of GLAD including substrate diffusion effects usually concentrate on fast rotating substrates 19,24 or stationary substrates. 25 In contrast to that, the more complex case of an intermediate substrate rotational speed with different diffusion strengths in direct comparison of experiment and simulation will be shown here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%