2016
DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhw012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of a Transfer Program for the Elderly in Mexico City on Co-Residing Children's School Enrollment

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These positive effects could partly reflect increased health expenditures expected in households with elderly members, together with increased investments in the education of co-residing children, as suggested by Gutiérrez, Juarez, and Rubli (2017). These positive effects could partly reflect increased health expenditures expected in households with elderly members, together with increased investments in the education of co-residing children, as suggested by Gutiérrez, Juarez, and Rubli (2017).…”
Section: B Potential Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These positive effects could partly reflect increased health expenditures expected in households with elderly members, together with increased investments in the education of co-residing children, as suggested by Gutiérrez, Juarez, and Rubli (2017). These positive effects could partly reflect increased health expenditures expected in households with elderly members, together with increased investments in the education of co-residing children, as suggested by Gutiérrez, Juarez, and Rubli (2017).…”
Section: B Potential Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a similar vein, we observe that the federal NC pension raises human capital investments among households whose oldest members are 65-69 or at least 70 years old by 1.4 and 1.6 percentage points, respectively. These positive effects could partly reflect increased health expenditures expected in households with elderly members, together with increased investments in the education of co-residing children, as suggested by Gutiérrez, Juarez, and Rubli (2017). 35 If NC pensions reduce the longevity risk faced by both older households and younger households with elderly relatives, these households might partly shift their investment to less liquid assets, such as human capital.…”
Section: B Potential Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Sections 4.1 and 4.3 above provide evidence that variations in co-residence choices in migrant households occur at the time or shortly after the occurrence of a migration episode. Nevertheless, the limited length of the observation period in the ENOE does not, per se, allow to rule out the hypothesis that the arrival of a new member could also occur later on, namely when the household of origin of the migrant starts benefiting from the positive income effect due to the receipt of remittances; Gutierrez et al (2017) do not find that the positive income effect induced by the receipt of an old-age pension modifies the composition of Mexican households.…”
Section: Threats To Our Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Given their age, part of this increase among older households could reflect health investments. However, some of it might also come from increased investments in education of co-residing children, as suggested by Gutiérrez, Juarez and Rubli (2015). 27 The combined impact of the federal and state NC program positively affects saving in human capital for households whose oldest member is 60 to 64 years old, but the opposite holds for those age 65 to 69, and no other impacts are found for other age groups.…”
Section: The Impact Of Non-contributory Programs On Saving Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%