The construction and validation of an instrument for the assessment of graduates of undergraduate nursing courses

Vieira, María Aparecida; Ohara, Conceição Vieira da Silva; Domenico, Edvane Birelo Lopes De

doi:10.1590/1518-8345.0834.2710

Cited by 16 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The questionnaire adherence rate was high (95% in the first round and 99% in the second round). These results corroborate the Delphi technique, whose application demands the recruitment of experienced, socially critical, and professionally self-critical judges who can make significant changes and adaptations to the analyzed material 17 - 18 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Validation of vulnerability markers of dysfunctions in the socioemotional development of infants

Silva

Mello

Takahashi

et al. 2018

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:to validate the vulnerability markers of dysfunctions in the socioemotional development of infants. Methods:study with a sequential exploratory mixed-method design. The vulnerability markers elaborated in the qualitative phase were analyzed by experts in the quantitative phase using the Delphi technique with a minimum consensus of 70%. Seventeen judges answered the questionnaire in the first round of analysis and 11 answered in the second round. Results:in the first round, two markers did not reach minimum consensus: the presence of instability in family relationships (66%) and delinquency and/or drug abuse by parents/caregivers (65%). In the second round, all markers were validated, with more than 90% agreement in most of the attributes, and reached the minimum consensus of 73%. Conclusion:the eight vulnerability markers reached the minimum consensus for validation, and a relevant instrument for infant care can be developed after assessing the reliability and clinically validating these markers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Validation of vulnerability markers of dysfunctions in the socioemotional development of infants

Silva

Mello

Takahashi

et al. 2018

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The data was collected by applying a validated instrument ( 16 ) , adapted for online research using the Google Docs Forms tool with semi-open, multiple-choice and Likert-type scales.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The instrument ( 16 ) is composed of three dimensions: sociodemographic characteristics, with 13 closed and semi-closed questions; characterization of the insertion and the professional trajectory, with nine questions of multiple choice and evaluation of the process of professional formation, with eight questions constructed in Likert type scale, one to five, in which one means “I totally agree and five”, “Disagree fully”.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Profile of nursing graduates: competencies and professional insertion

Barbosa

Luiz

Friedrich

et al. 2019

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:evaluate the profile of the graduates of Nursing a public college from the perception of skills developed during graduation and the process of professional insertion.Method:quantitative, exploratory and descriptive study. The sample was composed of 216 graduates. The data was collected by a validated questionnaire and sent to a population of 470 egresses via electronic mail. For the analysis of the data, frequencies, mean and standard deviation were applied and, for the correlation, the chi-square test.Results:the majority of the participants were female (88%) and the mean age was 29.62 years. The majority (65%) had an employment relationship, 14% worked in a single institution and 48% started working six months after graduation. Regarding the form of work, 56% work in care, with an average of 4.5 minimum wages and a weekly workload between 37 and 44 hours. The majority reported competence acquisition to practice the profession, assisting the patient in his integrality with ethics and applying technical and scientific concepts in care.Conclusion:the study made it possible to describe the singularities of nurses’ education, their insertion in the world of work and the impact on the educational institution, as well as the presentation of specific competences from the perspective of the graduates themselves.

show abstract

“…Para esta etapa, los expertos evaluaron el instrumento por una escala Likert con 4 niveles de importancia y posibilidad de una única respuesta para cada variable del instrumento con espacio adicional para sugerencias: Completamente Adecuado (4); Adecuado (3); Parcialmente Adecuado (2); Inadecuado (1) (17) . El tratamiento estadístico consideró las categorías CA y A que obtuvieron un consenso favorable del 80% de los expertos.…”

Section: Métodounclassified

“…El tratamiento estadístico consideró las categorías CA y A que obtuvieron un consenso favorable del 80% de los expertos. Este índice de concordancia se basó en otros estudios de validación (14,16,17) .…”

Section: Métodounclassified

Validação de checklist para avaliação da capacitação com simulação clínica do atendimento ao paciente séptico

Lino¹,

Oliveira²,

Silva³

et al. 2019

Enf Global

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: Development and validation of the contents of a checklist to evaluate the qualification of health professionals in septic patient care with clinical simulation.Method: instrument validation study, with two-stage structural design: instrument construction and validation of the checklist contents using the Delphi technique in two rounds.Results: The content validation was composed of ten items and forty-three sub-items analyzed by the evaluators. Through the Content Validity Index, four items with strong validation evidence were identified, Content Validity Index ≥ 0.8. We restructured the checklist according to the evaluators recommendations, maintaining the ten items, but reducing them to twenty-six sub-items, which in the second round Delphi presented a percentage of agreement above 80% for all variables relevant to the instrument.Conclusion: This method was effective to validate the checklist contents that will evaluate the qualification of health professionals in septic patient care, through clinical simulation. Objetivo: Construir y validar el contenido de un checklist para evaluación de la capacitación de profesionales del área de la salud en la atención al paciente séptico con simulación clínica.Método: Estudio de validación metodológica de instrumento, con delineamiento estructural en dos etapas: construcción del instrumento y validación de contenido del checklist utilizando la técnica Delphi en dos rondas.Resultados: La validación de contenido fue compuesta por diez ítems y cuarenta y tres subítems analizados por los evaluadores. A través del Índice de Validez de Contenido, se identificaron cuatro ítems con fuerte evidencia de validación, Índice de Validez de Contenido ≥ 0,8. En la segunda ronda Delphi presentó un porcentaje de concordancia superior al 80% para todas las variables pertinentes al instrumento. Se reestructuró el checklist según recomendaciones de los evaluadores, manteniendo los diez ítems, pero con reducción para veintiséis subítems, que en la segunda ronda Delphi presentó un porcentaje de concordancia superior al 80% para todas las variables pertinentes al instrumento.Conclusión: Método fue eficaz para validar el contenido de un checklist que evaluará la capacitación de profesionales de la salud en la atención al paciente séptico, por medio de simulación clínica. Objetivos: Construir e validar o conteúdo de um checklist para avaliação da capacitação de profissionais da área da saúde no atendimento ao paciente séptico com simulação clínica.Método: Estudo de validação metodológica de instrumento, com delineamento estrutural em duas etapas: construção do instrumento e validação de conteúdo do checklist utilizando a técnica Delphi em duas rodadas. Resultados: A validação de conteúdo foi composta por dez itens e quarenta e três subitens analisados pelos avaliadores. Por meio do Índice de Validade de Conteúdo, identificaram-se quatro itens com forte evidência de validação, Índice de Validade de Conteúdo ≥ 0,8. Reestruturou o checklist conforme recomendações dos avaliadores, mantendo os dez itens, porém com redução para vinte e seis subitens, que na 2ª rodada Delphi apresentou percentual de concordância acima de 80% para todas as variáveis pertinentes ao instrumento. Conclusão: Método foi eficaz para validar o conteúdo de um checklist que avaliará a capacitação de profissionais da saúde no atendimento ao paciente séptico, por meio de simulação clínica.

show abstract

The construction and validation of an instrument for the assessment of graduates of undergraduate nursing courses

Cited by 16 publications

References 11 publications

Validation of vulnerability markers of dysfunctions in the socioemotional development of infants

Validation of vulnerability markers of dysfunctions in the socioemotional development of infants

Profile of nursing graduates: competencies and professional insertion

Validação de checklist para avaliação da capacitação com simulação clínica do atendimento ao paciente séptico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About