2016
DOI: 10.5505/agri.2015.00483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparıson Of Trıptans, Nsaıd Or Combınatıon On Mıgraıne Attack Treatment

Abstract: ÖzetAmaç: Migren atağında baş ağrısı aynı atak içinde rekürrens gösterebilmektedir. Çalışmamızın amacı migren atağını sonlandırmak için yaygın kullanılan nonsteroid antienflamatuvar ilaçlar (NSAİİ) ve triptan gruplarından seçilen birer ajanın ve bunların kombine kullanı-mının migren atağını sonlandırma üzerindeki etkilerini göstermek ve karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Altmış yedi migren hastasına ait 201 atak değerlendirildi. Hastalar sıra ile üç ayrı tedavi grubuna bire birer alındılar. Birinci grup hasta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory test results were recorded for all patients. All the patients were evaluated by the orthopaedic specialist at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month of treatment using the Rockwood Scale (RS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain [5,6]. The Rockwood Scale, developed by Rockwood et al, is based on the evaluation of subjective responses of the patient in addition to the objective findings of the shoulder examination for each category ( Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory test results were recorded for all patients. All the patients were evaluated by the orthopaedic specialist at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month of treatment using the Rockwood Scale (RS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain [5,6]. The Rockwood Scale, developed by Rockwood et al, is based on the evaluation of subjective responses of the patient in addition to the objective findings of the shoulder examination for each category ( Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%